Quote:
Originally Posted by jacksonianmarch
He isnt a 1. He is a 2. He's won more games than anyone over the past 2 yrs and has been very consistent. He just isnt the lights out ace that a team with our payroll should have. He'll still be the 15-20 game winner with a sub 4 era that he's been for 2 yrs now. He just isnt a guy who you could toss in front of a playoff rotation that has him as their best pitcher. If he headed a deep rotation, then he'd be fine. The past couple yrs, the rotation has been top heavy. If Hughes and Kennedy pitch well behind Pettitte and Wang, we'll have a good rotation.
|
So are you saying that you would or wouldn't have done Santana for Wang, Melky, and a MiLBer?