|
Welcome to the Talksox Red Sox forum. For full access to all of our features, register for your free account now. Registration allows you to:
- Participate in thousands of threads containing 500,000+ posts by 5,000 members
- Send private messages, share photos, enter contests
- Gain full access to the best Red Sox community on the internet
If you are a current Talksox member, this message will disappear after you log in.
|
Vivid Seats is a great one-stop source for MLB game dates and tickets. Find MLB tickets for all teams including opening day, regular season and playoffs - Red Sox tickets are onsale now, as well as Houston Astros tickets for the entire baseball season.
|
 |
|
02-06-2006, 08:04 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
MVP
Join Date: Aug 26 2005
Posts: 3,719
|
Yankees' Offseason Review
From our friends at NoMaas.
Basic summary of the entire thing:
Quote:
The Bottom Line
In the end, Ca$hMoney has done some seriously fantastic work this offseason:
• He has removed the team’s most unproductive players.
• He let age (Gordon) walk for the sake of the future (draft picks, fiscal responsibility).
• He retained Matsui’s productivity and, more importantly, his invaluable function as a bridge to the Asian market.
• He rebuilt a bullpen with guys who miss bats and don’t give up hits.
o None of the main guys, except for Myers (for whom the statistic doesn’t really matter), has a K/9 below 8.5 over the past three years.
o None of the main guys is even close to giving up a hit per inning.
o All of them are locked up for one or two years, relatively cheaply, except for Farnsworth who got the going rate of the market, and ended up being cheaper than Gordon.
• He preserved all of the potential bullpen arms in the minors, however marginal they may turn out to be.
• He landed the only centerfield option out there that would not compromise his intent to incubate the farm system as it germinates in the lower levels, AND who would provide the team with a guaranteed level of production. This point really needs to be made clear: There were no other options out there ANYWHERE that offered a high standard of contribution towards winning and a promise to leave the youngsters undisturbed. Damon was the only option. Period, end of story. (We still know Johnny Damon to be grossly overrated by both the media and the general population of sports fans.)
• He didn’t entertain any offers for Cano or Wang. Ca$hMoney made like a protective girlfriend this winter, getting in the face of any suitors seeking to pry away his two ML youngsters and decreeing “GET MY MAN’S NAME OUTCHYO’ MOUTH.” The only time we even heard either of their names in a deal was the Cano-Wang-Duncan for Dontrelle and Cabrera offer that he threw out to the Marlins. Otherwise, he let the two former prospects conduct themselves in the offseason with a comfort level that Yankee youngsters have not felt in decades.
• He traded one minor leaguer. One. And his name was Ben Julianel. He left every other non-Major Leaguer, including actual prospects that the Yankees had, untouched. In order for the farm to regenerate, it needs to be reseeded and left alone for a considerable amount of time. The Yankee system that was stacked with guys in the lower levels, and was poised to potentially have a breakthrough year, is as whole and halcyon today as it was five months ago…and the team improved on the Major League level in the meantime.
• Currently, the Yankee payroll stands around $187-$189 million (including Chacon), which is $20 million less than it was in 2005.
• He left the team open to failure in the DH slot (8th hitter in the lineup) but left the situation relatively easy to remedy, both in the ability to demote Bernie and the collection of players from which to choose a replacement.
• The bench and fourth OF assignments could still be improved.
As you can see, Ca$hMoney did a major reshaping of the Yankees, improving their productivity, protecting the youth at all levels, and dropping the payroll. While many of the moves were not the first choice of the NoMaas staff, the end result bolstered the organization’s strategy, and is a development that we can actually endorse, and endorse wholly and rationally. Ca$hMoney is clearly steering the Yankees in a very positive direction, putting them on the road to thorough organizational efficiency and prosperity.
|
__________________
When we are born, we cry, that we are come
To this great stage of fools.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 08:09 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 27 2006
Posts: 2,558
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Optimist
From our friends at NoMaas.
Basic summary of the entire thing:
|
I agree wholeheartedly with this post...
__________________
1.0 back
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 08:09 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Major Leaguer
Join Date: Jan 31 2006
Location: Rockford, MI
Posts: 600
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Just out of curiousity (since I only joined this site a week ago), but how come you Yankee fans hang out here? (aren't there any Yankee boards?) I don't mean this negatively at all, just wonderin'.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 08:11 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
MVP
Join Date: Aug 26 2005
Posts: 3,719
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Monster is my Mom
Just out of curiousity (since I only joined this site a week ago), but how come you Yankee fans hang out here? (aren't there any Yankee boards?) I don't mean this negatively at all, just wonderin'.
|
It's one of the better baseball forums on the web (at least that I've seen.)
__________________
When we are born, we cry, that we are come
To this great stage of fools.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 08:18 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Evil Empire Ambassador
Join Date: May 30 2005
Location: Empire State!
Posts: 6,744
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Optimist
It's one of the better baseball forums on the web (at least that I've seen.)
|
That, and there are no really good Yankee boards. I am a member at NYYfans.com but I dont like it there.
Good stuff optimist, pretty good offseason in total.
BTW, off topic, but can anyone give me the payroll for the Sox?
__________________
4 3 5 7 37 8 8 16 15 32 9 37 10 1 44 23 49 42
"Statistics are used much like a drunk uses a lamp post: for support, not illumination."
-Vin Scully
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 08:28 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 27 2006
Posts: 2,558
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 26 to 6
That, and there are no really good Yankee boards. I am a member at NYYfans.com but I dont like it there.
Good stuff optimist, pretty good offseason in total.
BTW, off topic, but can anyone give me the payroll for the Sox?
|
got banned from a few. Am currently on the yankees.com one but that sucks too. I think the majority of on-line yankee posters are too young to have a good online conversation. So I joined the herald, and once it died, I was led here by some of my friends....
__________________
1.0 back
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 08:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
MVP
Join Date: Aug 31 2005
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 3,088
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Yankees.com sucks, YESnetwork.com sucks and the moderator over there is a flat out joke, this place is one of the best baseball forums out there. Plus I like the angle of being a Yankee fan on Red Sox turf. It gives me a new feel for the rivalery.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 08:47 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
MVP
Join Date: Aug 31 2005
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 3,088
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
NoMass as usual nailed it for the most part.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:13 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
www.soxprospects.com
Join Date: Dec 19 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 6,128
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 26 to 6
That, and there are no really good Yankee boards. I am a member at NYYfans.com but I dont like it there.
Good stuff optimist, pretty good offseason in total.
BTW, off topic, but can anyone give me the payroll for the Sox?
|
this is from another red sox board i am on
I understand that the Renteria payment this year is $3mm, and the AAV for the $11mm payment (not $8mm) is $3.67mm.
I will update the numbers below.
The roster would look like this:
Lineup: Crisp, Loretta, Ortiz, Manny, Nixon, Lowell, Varitek, Youkilis, A-Gon
Bench: Flaherty, Stern (for 18 days)/RHH backup CF, Snow, Cora
Rotation: Schilling, Beckett, Wells, Clement, Wakefield,
Bullpen: Foulke, Papelbon, Timlin, Riske, Seanez, Arroyo, Tavarez
Let's assume a budget of $126.5 million to spend, AAV-wise, on the 25 man roster. This keeps the team below the luxury tax threshold. Let's also assume that the Red Sox pays $3.67mm to Atlanta in the Renteria deal.
The 2006 AAV or AAV estimates for the top 25 players plus the cash payment is $128.15 million, as follows:
Manny (20), Schilling (12.75), Varitek (10), Wells (9), Clement (8.5), Lowell (8), Nixon (6.5), Ortiz (6.25), Foulke (6), Beckett (4.33), Wakefield (4), Arroyo/Loretta (3.75 ea.), Timlin (3.5), Tavarez (3.35), Gonzalez (3), Crisp (2.75), Seanez (2.1), Snow (2), Riske (1.8), Cora (1.35), Flaherty (0.75), Youkilis/Papelbon/Stern (0.35 ea.)
This is approx. $1.65 million over the budgeted cap I laid out above.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:28 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Duck, I says.
Join Date: Jun 16 2005
Posts: 17,435
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheRivernator
I agree wholeheartedly with this post...
|
And we are guilty of drinking the kool-aid? HA!
I've never seen someone get so much credit for doing nothing other than offering the most money to fill the position they needed filled most. That article was some serious ball-washing. He gets credit for "gaining" a draft pick in letting Gordon go? What about the 1st and 2nd rounders he gave up for Damon and Farnsworth? Personally, I think now would be the time to sell high on Wang given the fact that he's had 3 seasons shortened by shoulder injuries in the last 5 years, but what the heck, it doesn't dissappoint me if they hold on to him and he gets hurt again, and again.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:41 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 27 2006
Posts: 2,558
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by One Red Seat
And we are guilty of drinking the kool-aid? HA!
I've never seen someone get so much credit for doing nothing other than offering the most money to fill the position they needed filled most. That article was some serious ball-washing. He gets credit for "gaining" a draft pick in letting Gordon go? What about the 1st and 2nd rounders he gave up for Damon and Farnsworth? Personally, I think now would be the time to sell high on Wang given the fact that he's had 3 seasons shortened by shoulder injuries in the last 5 years, but what the heck, it doesn't dissappoint me if they hold on to him and he gets hurt again, and again.
|
He gave up a 1st rounder for Damon and one second rounder for Farns. We got a 1st and 2nd rounder for Gordon. Basically, it was a trade of Gordon for Farns and Damon plus being able to move up in the draft by 10 or so spots for the first 2 rounds.
His negotiating with Damon was amazing. You have to admit that he grabbed the bull by the horns and had Boraby the balls. I thought that whatever the yankees offered, that the sox would meet damon halfway and likely retain his services. Cashman made sure that wouldnt happen. As for the pen, he refilled it with the best available talent, how they will be in 2006 is anybody's guess. Basically, he filled our 2 biggest holes, he spared the farm, and dropped payroll by 20 mil. Sounds like a good job to me....
__________________
1.0 back
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:45 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
www.soxprospects.com
Join Date: Dec 19 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 6,128
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheRivernator
He gave up a 1st rounder for Damon and one second rounder for Farns. We got a 1st and 2nd rounder for Gordon. Basically, it was a trade of Gordon for Farns and Damon plus being able to move up in the draft by 10 or so spots for the first 2 rounds.
His negotiating with Damon was amazing. You have to admit that he grabbed the bull by the horns and had Boraby the balls. I thought that whatever the yankees offered, that the sox would meet damon halfway and likely retain his services. Cashman made sure that wouldnt happen. As for the pen, he refilled it with the best available talent, how they will be in 2006 is anybody's guess. Basically, he filled our 2 biggest holes, he spared the farm, and dropped payroll by 20 mil. Sounds like a good job to me....
|
spared what farm and the yanks payroll was going to drop by alot anyways with bernie's 15 mil and kevin browns 16 mil off the books.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:47 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Duck, I says.
Join Date: Jun 16 2005
Posts: 17,435
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheRivernator
He gave up a 1st rounder for Damon and one second rounder for Farns. We got a 1st and 2nd rounder for Gordon. Basically, it was a trade of Gordon for Farns and Damon plus being able to move up in the draft by 10 or so spots for the first 2 rounds.
His negotiating with Damon was amazing. You have to admit that he grabbed the bull by the horns and had Boraby the balls. I thought that whatever the yankees offered, that the sox would meet damon halfway and likely retain his services. Cashman made sure that wouldnt happen. As for the pen, he refilled it with the best available talent, how they will be in 2006 is anybody's guess. Basically, he filled our 2 biggest holes, he spared the farm, and dropped payroll by 20 mil. Sounds like a good job to me....
|
You have 2 picks throug the first two rounds. Philly's 1st rounder for Gordon (which moved you up from 28 to 21) and a sandwich pick. You have no 2nd round pick. Saying he gained them picks without acknowledging the picks he gave up is nothing more than creative editting. How can this guy keep getting credit for being such a "great" GM? He goes into negotiations with the biggest offer on the table every time.
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:49 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Major Leaguer
Join Date: Sep 02 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 744
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Was that just an off-season recap?? By josh i think it was. That only means one thing...it's almost over! 9 days till pitchers and catchers guys, 9 friggin days.
I like the article a lot. Everything it says is true (albeit some mild exaggerations). I know people say the Yanks overpaid for Damon but the Yanks needed to lock down a good CF, and they did exactly that. Cash didn't trade away Wang and Cano, and now I'm just repeating what everyone else said so overall I'm excited to see how everything that happened this off-season shakes out come April.
__________________
27 in '07 sounds better anyway
Rest in Peace Cory Lidle
|
|
|
02-06-2006, 09:54 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 27 2006
Posts: 2,558
|
Re: Yankees' Offseason Review
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by One Red Seat
You have 2 picks throug the first two rounds. Philly's 1st rounder for Gordon (which moved you up from 28 to 21) and a sandwich pick. You have no 2nd round pick. Saying he gained them picks without acknowledging the picks he gave up is nothing more than creative editting. How can this guy keep getting credit for being such a "great" GM? He goes into negotiations with the biggest offer on the table every time.
|
maybe you arent familiar with the previous yankee MO. We usually dont lose players and we take them from other teams, so we dont get to keep our picks. Over the past 3 yrs, we have had 1st rounders and we will again this yr, while adding premier players for the positions we needed. Take a look at how our single A team will be this yr and then you will see the magnitude of what Cash has done....
__________________
1.0 back
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 PM.
|