|
Welcome to the Talksox Red Sox forum. For full access to all of our features, register for your free account now. Registration allows you to:
- Participate in thousands of threads containing 500,000+ posts by 5,000 members
- Send private messages, share photos, enter contests
- Gain full access to the best Red Sox community on the internet
If you are a current Talksox member, this message will disappear after you log in.
|
Vivid Seats is a great one-stop source for MLB game dates and tickets. Find MLB tickets for all teams including opening day, regular season and playoffs - Red Sox tickets are onsale now, as well as Houston Astros tickets for the entire baseball season.
|
 |
|
07-06-2009, 11:03 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
|
Deity
Join Date: Apr 17 2006
Posts: 19,368
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Sorry YH213 I should have quoted Dutchy.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:14 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
|
Deity
Join Date: Aug 04 2008
Posts: 10,400
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
The conventional wisdom goes that Kessel should be swapped for a D-man.
This on a team that already allowed the lowest goals in the NHL last year IIRC.
There's a sentiment that we got exposed in the playoffs because we need another puckmover. Completely ignoring the fact that we got exposed in the playoffs largely because two of our best puckmovers were shelved with injuries.
When it comes time to move players to improve the roster, you don't start with 21 y ear old 30+ goal wings. There is no overwhelming need to get rid of Phil Kessel. he is doing what he was drafted to do, and doing it well. I know the Bruins love tough guys, but if we can't tolerate a wide mix of skillsets on the Bruins, including light-hitting speed forwards like Kessel, we'll never win anything.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:20 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 27 2009
Location: Quebec
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dojji
The conventional wisdom goes that Kessel should be swapped for a D-man.
This on a team that already allowed the lowest goals in the NHL last year IIRC.
There's a sentiment that we got exposed in the playoffs because we need another puckmover. Completely ignoring the fact that we got exposed in the playoffs largely because two of our best puckmovers were shelved with injuries.
When it comes time to move players to improve the roster, you don't start with 21 y ear old 30+ goal wings. There is no overwhelming need to get rid of Phil Kessel. he is doing what he was drafted to do, and doing it well. I know the Bruins love tough guys, but if we can't tolerate a wide mix of skillsets on the Bruins, including light-hitting speed forwards like Kessel, we'll never win anything.
|
Absolutely nobody is complaining that Kessel is "light-hitting". The complaint is that he scored 81% of his goals against the worst teams in the NHL.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:36 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
|
Deity
Join Date: Aug 04 2008
Posts: 10,400
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
And he scored about a goal a game in the playoffs, including against the team that ultimately defeated us, and did it with a torn rotator cuff. Playoff competition is the toughest there is, and he didn't just survive there, he thrived.
besides, where the hell did you expect a goal scorer to score most of his goals? As long as he's actually scoring against tough competition I don't care if he murders the weaker teams, in fact I'm glad he's doing it. Someone has to. The alternative is pretty embarrassing.
Also, Kessel would probably have scored more goals if he was actually getting the share of playoff time most teams' goal scoring leaders get. For some reason he can't buy, beg, borrow or steal his way onto PP unit 1, even though throughout the playoffs our biggest problem -- by a LOT -- was executing the power play.
Now, let's see you break it down and actually defend those numbers because there's NWIH he actually scored 81% of his goals against the very worst teams in the NHL so you swallowed some mediot's BS whole on that one, probably based on an exaggerated definition of "worst teams in the NHL."
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:40 PM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 27 2009
Location: Quebec
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dojji
And he scored about a goal a game in the playoffs, including against the team that ultimately defeated us, and did it with a torn rotator cuff. Playoff competition is the toughest there is, and he didn't just survive there, he thrived.
besides, where the hell did you expect a goal scorer to score most of his goals? As long as he's actually scoring against tough competition I don't care if he murders the weaker teams, in fact I'm glad he's doing it. Someone has to. The alternative is pretty embarrassing.
Now, let's see you break it down and actually defend those numbers because there's NWIH he actually scored 81% of his goals against the very worst teams in the NHL so you swallowed some mediot's BS whole on that one, probably based on an exaggerated definition of "worst teams in the NHL."
|
No he didn't, he scored 6 goals in 11 games. And he only scored in 1 game against the Canes. That's not "thriving" by any stretch of the imagination. You might want to look up stats before you talk next time.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:43 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
|
Deity
Join Date: Aug 04 2008
Posts: 10,400
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
OK, then, "point per game pace," Mr. Technical. 11 points in 11 games. 6 goals, 5 assists. Still not a performance to scoff at by any stretch of the imagination.
Last edited by Dojji; 07-06-2009 at 11:47 PM.
|
|
|
07-06-2009, 11:51 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 27 2009
Location: Quebec
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dojji
OK, then, "point per game pace," Mr. Technical. 11 points in 11 games. 6 goals, 5 assists. Still not a performance to scoff at by any stretch of the imagination.
|
He scored in only one game against the Canes. But that's a small sample size. If you want a more legit sample size, he scored 29 of his goals against teams that didn't make the playoffs and he scored 7 of his goals against teams that made the playofffs.
I never said he's bad. I've said multiple times he's a good goal scorer and I'd prefer he comes back (at a reasonable price). But for some reason, the fact that I don't claim he's perfect has caused fans to criticize me.
He's a great goal scorer. He's just a little streaky and doesn't play good enough defense to be payed $5 million. That's what I've said all along regardless of what pink hat fans have claimed I've said.
|
|
|
07-07-2009, 12:16 AM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
|
Deity
Join Date: Aug 04 2008
Posts: 10,400
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Good luck finding a similar player on the market for $5M or less.
|
|
|
07-07-2009, 08:36 AM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
|
Deity
Join Date: Apr 17 2006
Posts: 19,368
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Where are those 36 goals being made up then, Dutchy?
|
|
|
07-07-2009, 06:25 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 27 2009
Location: Quebec
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Hunwick files for arbitration, so it definitely looks like he's back.
http://bigbadblog.weei.com/sports/bo...n-with-bruins/
Add him to the list of Krejci, Recchi and Bitz. We also brought in Begin. The only thing that's really left is the Kessel situation.
|
|
|
07-07-2009, 06:32 PM
|
#71 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 27 2009
Location: Quebec
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKilo
Where are those 36 goals being made up then, Dutchy?
|
We probably won't replace all 36 goals. We'd have to place Recchi and Sturm on the 1st line and hope for the best. We won't score as many goals overall, but they could easily match Kessel's 7 goals against playoff caliber teams.
Again, I'd prefer to keep Kessel. Just don't know how realistic it is given his salary demands.
|
|
|
07-07-2009, 10:03 PM
|
#72 (permalink)
|
|
Deity
Join Date: Aug 04 2008
Posts: 10,400
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
We don't know what his salary demands are.
|
|
|
07-07-2009, 10:13 PM
|
#73 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 27 2009
Location: Quebec
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dojji
We don't know what his salary demands are.
|
His agent has said he wants $5 million.
|
|
|
07-07-2009, 10:14 PM
|
#74 (permalink)
|
|
Deity
Join Date: Aug 04 2008
Posts: 10,400
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
Link?
|
|
|
07-07-2009, 10:55 PM
|
#75 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 27 2009
Location: Quebec
Posts: 2,028
|
Re: Bruins Off-Season Thread
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 PM.
|