|
|
Welcome to Talksox. For full access to all of our features, register for your free account now.
Registration allows you to:
- Respond to over 500,000 posts in 12,000+ threads by 5,000 members
- Send private messages, share photos, make friends
- Gain full access to the best Red Sox community on the internet
If you are a current Talksox member, this message will disappear after you log in.
|
Vivid Seats is a great one-stop source for MLB game dates and tickets. Find MLB tickets for all teams including opening day, regular season and playoffs - Red Sox tickets are onsale now, as well as Houston Astros tickets for the entire baseball season.
|
 |
|
09-30-2009, 04:07 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Is With Coco
Join Date: Apr 27 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 19,445
|
Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Now that the Sox are officially in the postseason, I figured we should have a thread to discuss to first round before it starts on 10/8 (assuming the Yankees choose Series A).
The pitching matchups will likely be:
10/8: Lester v. Lackey
10/9: Beckett v. Weaver
10/11: Buchholz v. Kazmir
10/12: Matsuzaka v. Saunders (if necessary)
10/14: Lester v. Lackey (if necessary)
I'll put the rosters in this post when they're announced, but the projected lineups are:
Red Sox:
CF Jacoby Ellsbury
2B Dustin Pedroia
C Victor Martinez
1B Kevin Youkilis
DH David Ortiz
LF Jason Bay
3B Mike Lowell
RF J.D. Drew
SS Alex Gonzalez
Angels:
3B Chone Figgins
SS Erick Aybar
RF Bobby Abreu
DH Vladimir Guerrero
CF Torii Hunter
1B Kendry Morales
LF Juan Rivera
2B Howie Kendrick
C Mike Napoli
Lineups obviously could and will be different some games.
By the way, this thread is for discussion, predictions and general excitement/anticipation.
Last edited by Coco's Disciples; 09-30-2009 at 04:30 PM.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 04:26 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 17 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 9,411
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Napoli is gonna play over Mathis, for one thing...
__________________
Quote:
|
Asked what Schill would bring to the Senate, Pedroia joked, "Probably a big appetite."
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 04:30 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Is With Coco
Join Date: Apr 27 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 19,445
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
I always get those two confused. Thanks.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 05:05 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Aug 23 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,458
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Wouldn't Lester being starting in game four (if necessary)?
I really do not see Tito going with a four man rotation, but that is my opinion.
__________________
"How do you catch a knuckleball? Wait until it stops rolling, then go to the backstop and pick it up."
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 05:13 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Is With Coco
Join Date: Apr 27 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 19,445
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
According to the Herald article that reported Lester starting game one, Matsuzaka would likely pitch Game 4, IIRC.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 05:27 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Aug 23 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,458
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coco's Disciples
According to the Herald article that reported Lester starting game one, Matsuzaka would likely pitch Game 4, IIRC.
|
Oh ok. Thank you.
__________________
"How do you catch a knuckleball? Wait until it stops rolling, then go to the backstop and pick it up."
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 06:36 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Jul 17 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 9,411
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by RWTP24
Wouldn't Lester being starting in game four (if necessary)
|
He should.
__________________
Quote:
|
Asked what Schill would bring to the Senate, Pedroia joked, "Probably a big appetite."
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 06:55 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 30 2006
Location: Huizen, Netherlands
Posts: 6,928
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
I would have to say the pitching match ups look to favor the Red Sox the 1st 2 games.
__________________
Mark Teahen once ate a Rubix cube and shat it out solved...wut
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 08:09 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Aug 23 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,458
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by BSN07
I would have to say the pitching match ups look to favor the Red Sox the 1st 2 games.
|
If we play Red Sox baseball, I see the Sox winning in four games.
__________________
"How do you catch a knuckleball? Wait until it stops rolling, then go to the backstop and pick it up."
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 09:59 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Aug 04 2005
Location: Toronto Ontario
Posts: 928
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by RWTP24
If we play Red Sox baseball, I see the Sox winning in four games.
|
Couldn't agree more with you. I like the way our pitching matches up with that of the Angels and if the bats are going like they can the Sox are dangerous.
__________________
1903,1912,1915,1916,2004,2007 World Series Champions
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 10:01 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Aug 04 2008
Posts: 9,102
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
The key is going to be keeping runners off the basepaths and controlling the running game.
__________________
Fight the hate.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 10:03 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Smiling Drew is smiling.
Join Date: Nov 02 2008
Location: Far away.
Posts: 13,250
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dojji
The key is going to be keeping runners off the basepaths and controlling the running game.
|
Good luck with number 2.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spudboy
Thank God. I was afraid that you had passed out in a pool of Keystone Light and urine.
Please go on.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Youk Of The Nation
There is no need to be redundant.
|
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 11:49 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
New Album out Dec 8th
Join Date: Apr 17 2006
Posts: 19,269
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Keep in mind that the rotations will not be set until the Yankees choose which series they want, it's entirely possible they take the short series to miss Verlander as much as possible.
If the Sox are up 2-1, Dice pitches game 4. If it's an elimination game, Lester will take the hill.
__________________
I hate to break it to you but there is no big lie. There is no system. The universe is indifferent.
|
|
|
09-30-2009, 11:52 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Legend
Join Date: Oct 02 2004
Posts: 5,156
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheKilo
Keep in mind that the rotations will not be set until the Yankees choose which series they want, it's entirely possible they take the short series to miss Verlander as much as possible.
If the Sox are up 2-1, Dice pitches game 4. If it's an elimination game, Lester will take the hill.
|
Won't matter with Verlander. If he starts Game 1, along with CC, that limits both of them to two starts on regular rest (if it goes five games). If he starts Game 2 (currently lined up for that), he would still be eligible to pitch two games on regular rest. They will almost certainly choose the longer series.
__________________
We should try not to forget how difficult it is to win a Major League Baseball championship.
|
|
|
10-01-2009, 05:03 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Oct 09 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,557
|
Re: Red Sox v. Angels ALDS Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dojji
The key is going to be keeping runners off the basepaths and controlling the running game.
|
Not possible with Tek and VMart.
__________________
How about figuring out that second base situation? Maybe sign someone that isn't a hobbit?
Away to the Shire, Treebeard!
http://jewsinbaseball.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 PM.
|