Register now to remove this ad

Page 52 of 73 FirstFirst ... 242505152535462 ... LastLast
Results 766 to 780 of 1084

Thread: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

  1. #766
    King of TalkSox a700hitter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    69,780

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Dipre;609166;
    And, as we all know, Girardi isn't half the manager Torre was. To some extent, the Yankees win in spite of Girardi, just like the Sox win in spite of Tito, but right now, the talent scale is clearly tipped in the Sox favor. There's just no other way to slice it.
    None.
    The King of TalkSox has Spoken.

    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    Chaim, you are in the big leagues now. Drawing 10,000 fans a game is not going to cut it, and people don’t buy tickets to Fenway to talk about the Farm

    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    "Relief pitchers are a crapshoot." No, the truth is "Crapshoot pitchers are relievers."

  2. #767

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by yankees228;609164;
    I've seen people compare the 2011 Yankees to the 2004 Yankees, and I think that's a definite possibility. That team didn't get a lot of starting pitching, scored a ton of runs, and dominated the late innings.
    How Torre squeezed 70 wins out of his starters in 2004 is beyond me. The SP posted a 4.84 ERA, and was good for 70 wins.

    Right now, the AL East is just way too good for your SP to post a 4.8+ ERA and be good for more than 60 wins.

    Look at the 2004 standings. You had NY with 101 wins, BOS with 98, and then 3rd place was BAL with 78 wins.

    The Jays are getting much better (they were closer to the Sox last year than the Sox were to the Yanks), the Orioles made some nice off season acquisitions, and the Rays pitching staff is going to at least keep them in a lot of games through 7 innings.
    Quote Originally Posted by seabeachfred View Post
    Also we have to trade Bogaerts and Bradley while they still have some interest from other teams. They are lemons. Are you aware that X is hitting less than 130 with RISP. As I said in April we could have a choker on our hands. I will say this August....WE DO HAVE A CHOKER ON OUR HANDS.

  3. #768

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by SoxFanForsyth;609171;
    How Torre squeezed 70 wins out of his starters in 2004 is beyond me. The SP posted a 4.84 ERA, and was good for 70 wins.

    Right now, the AL East is just way too good for your SP to post a 4.8+ ERA and be good for more than 60 wins.

    Look at the 2004 standings. You had NY with 101 wins, BOS with 98, and then 3rd place was BAL with 78 wins.

    The Jays are getting much better (they were closer to the Sox last year than the Sox were to the Yanks), the Orioles made some nice off season acquisitions, and the Rays pitching staff is going to at least keep them in a lot of games through 7 innings.
    I'm not saying I expect equal success. My point is that the two teams seem to be constructed similarly.

  4. #769
    This is my rifle....
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    19,591

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by yankees228;609164;
    I've seen people compare the 2011 Yankees to the 2004 Yankees, and I think that's a definite possibility. That team didn't get a lot of starting pitching, scored a ton of runs, and dominated the late innings.
    Pythag had them at 89-73. A good BP can sometimes help you beat your Pythag, but I wouldn't count on being 12 wins better.

    EDIT: Nevermind, apparently, by your last post, the point you appeared to be making was not what you were trying to say.

  5. #770
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,520

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Hopefully we can nail down Andruw Jones soon. He'll be a nice fourth outfielder I think, shouldn't cost a ton either.

  6. #771

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by ORS;609177;
    Pythag had them at 89-73. A good BP can sometimes help you beat your Pythag, but I wouldn't count on being 12 wins better.

    EDIT: Nevermind, apparently, by your last post, the point you appeared to be making was not what you were trying to say.
    Yeah my fault, I should have made that clearer in my initial post. The 2004 team over-performed by a tremendous amount, and it would be foolish to expect similar success this year. It's just that, on paper, the teams seem to be similar. I do think this team can win in the low 90s, especially if they replace Mitre in the rotation.

  7. #772

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    I think the Yanks are about a 92 win team. I think with an improvement from Jeter and ARod, we'll have a better offense. Our rotation will be weaker without Pettitte and the degree of that weakness will depend on Burnett and whoever we have fill out the #4 spot. And I think our pen is obviously stronger. And right now, I think the sox are about a 95-98 win team

  8. #773
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,072

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by jacksonianmarch;609191;
    I think the Yanks are about a 92 win team. I think with an improvement from Jeter and ARod, we'll have a better offense. Our rotation will be weaker without Pettitte and the degree of that weakness will depend on Burnett and whoever we have fill out the #4 spot. And I think our pen is obviously stronger. And right now, I think the sox are about a 95-98 win team
    A full season of Granderson. Russel Martin over Cervelli and our lockdown pen. Makes this team better than last year. They still need that starter. I'd like them to get Wandy Rodriguez.

  9. #774

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    I'd like them to get someone like Wandy Rodriguez or Gavin Floyd as well, but I'm also concerned about what it would cost them. The Yankees shouldn't get desperate and part with Montero in exchange for a pitcher of that caliber. I know you're not suggesting that, but with the Yankees needing rotation help (and with the other teams knowing they need rotation help), I could see it happening.

    If they can get a 5+ WAR pitcher for the next 5 years (or so), then they should consider trading Montero, but not for less.

  10. #775
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,072

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by yankees228;609196;

    If they can get a 5+ WAR pitcher for the next 5 years (or so), then they should consider trading Montero, but not for less.
    I don't think there's a pitcher like that in the trade market right now. Everyone's locked and signed. Even Floyd won't be traded now, unless Peavy is healthy or the ChiSox decide to put Chris Sale in the rotation.

  11. #776

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by diony;609198;
    I don't think there's a pitcher like that in the trade market right now. Everyone's locked and signed. Even Floyd won't be traded now, unless Peavy is healthy or the ChiSox decide to put Chris Sale in the rotation.
    I tend to agree, but I don't think that means they should settle for less in a deal for Montero.

  12. #777

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by diony;609194;
    A full season of Granderson. Russel Martin over Cervelli and our lockdown pen. Makes this team better than last year. They still need that starter. I'd like them to get Wandy Rodriguez.
    Cervelli hit .271 with a .359 OBP last year. No power, obviously, though. I agree that Martin will be better in the future than Cervelli will be in the future, but if Martin hits .271/359 this year, he'll be doing well.

    I just don't see how Granderson playing 24 more games and Martin replacing Cervelli makes the Yankees better than last year. :dunno:
    Quote Originally Posted by seabeachfred View Post
    Also we have to trade Bogaerts and Bradley while they still have some interest from other teams. They are lemons. Are you aware that X is hitting less than 130 with RISP. As I said in April we could have a choker on our hands. I will say this August....WE DO HAVE A CHOKER ON OUR HANDS.

  13. #778

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by SoxFanForsyth;609200;
    Cervelli hit .271 with a .359 OBP last year. No power, obviously, though. I agree that Martin will be better in the future than Cervelli will be in the future, but if Martin hits .271/359 this year, he'll be doing well.

    I just don't see how Granderson playing 24 more games and Martin replacing Cervelli makes the Yankees better than last year. :dunno:
    I'm not saying they'll be better than last year, but I expect Granderson to have a better season than he did in 2010 (in addition to playing more games), and Martin should provide better defense than Cervelli.

  14. #779
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,072

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by SoxFanForsyth;609200;
    Cervelli hit .271 with a .359 OBP last year. No power, obviously, though. I agree that Martin will be better in the future than Cervelli will be in the future, but if Martin hits .271/359 this year, he'll be doing well.
    Granderson made adjustments in the 2nd half, and he can implement that over the course of a full season. He'll definitely hit 35 bombs and OPS .900. Martin is an upgrade offensively and defensively than Cervelli. Cervelli's numbers are inflated by a monster April and September, don't be fooled.

  15. #780

    Re: Yankees 2010-2011 Hotstove Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by diony;609202;
    Granderson made adjustments in the 2nd half, and he can implement that over the course of a full season. He'll definitely hit 35 bombs and OPS .900. Martin is an upgrade offensively and defensively than Cervelli. Cervelli's numbers are inflated by a monster April and September, don't be fooled.
    It's way too optimistic to say Granderson will definitely produce those numbers. I expect his 2011 offensive numbers to be much closer to what he did in the second half last year, as opposed to the first. But I think expecting a .900 OPS is going overboard.

    At the same time, I think Granderson is capable of producing a 5+ WAR this year.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •