Originally Posted by
italstallianion;595515;
I think that the voting here has gone A LOT better than the voting in the baseball redraft. Some of that voting was retarded.
Besides, I think different people are building their teams and voting in different manners. It seems that you and Kilo (and even Coco and Jacoby to an extent) are very similar in your ways of thinking, building a team, and voting, and then there are other methods of accomplishing this task, like the methods that WhiskeyBreath, Yrtb, Jbay and I took. There are even other ways to handle it, like the "when in doubt, draft everyone on my favourite team" method that boston22407 and Suns did.
My point is, and I think what WhiskeyBreath and Ytrb are trying to say is, while teamwork and meshing are important abilities to building a team, nobody has PROOF that the players would go well together, and it really does seem like a cheap cop out when your team isn't as talented as your opponents. I'm NOT saying that this is the case with your team YH or Kilo's team, but that's what it looks like. Unless the players have played together in the past (ie Stockton and Malone, Pippen and Jordan) then there really isn't any evidence to suggest that one team's players would mesh together better than anothers, with the only exception being the presence of locker room cancers. So that argument really doesn't have much weight.
It also seems like a pattern that the person who brings up teamwork, is the owner of the less talented team.