Register now to remove this ad

Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 169

Thread: Lackey to the Cardinals

  1. #1
    Your pal, Pal Palodios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    13,946

    Lackey to the Cardinals

    Joe Kelly / Allen Craig coming back.

    What the fuck? Ben got fleeced here.

  2. #2
    Your pal, Pal Palodios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    13,946
    This is bad. Very very bad. I can't understand how bad this deal is.

  3. #3
    All-Star BigPapi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,986
    Quote Originally Posted by Palodios View Post
    This is bad. Very very bad. I can't understand how bad this deal is.
    If craig can't regain form, it was a terrible deal. Allen craig has been shit.

  4. #4
    Deity
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    20,491
    Fuck!!! U have got to be kidding me? Horrible trade!!

  5. #5
    MVP RedSoxNC84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,901
    What the fuck. Ben. Dude. Come on.

  6. #6
    Legend
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    7,360
    I suspect these aren't "Ben" trades.

  7. #7
    Your pal, Pal Palodios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    13,946
    Quote Originally Posted by BigPapi View Post
    If craig can't regain form, it was a terrible deal. Allen craig has been shit.
    Allen Craig is owed $25 million over the next three years. Joe Kelly recently was shelled by the Chicago Cubs and the Padres.

    Lackey is a dominant #2 pitcher who will pitch for the minimum next year. The Red Sox are also giving someone else away with him.

    What on earth happened? How? Why? This is the worst trade I've ever seen.

  8. #8
    All-Star Navafan29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    911
    Imo this is a great deal. Kelly can start and relief pitch. Craig can be a fantastic hitter once he gets going. Surprised we didn't have to give up more for these two. If we play moneyball to get a starting rotation again (if that's even possible) we can win the division next year.

  9. #9
    All-Star BigPapi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,986
    What the hell are we doing here. We have craig, victorino, nava, cespedes, jackie bradley jr and sometimes brock holt in the outfield now and now mookie can't come up?

  10. #10
    MVP RedSoxNC84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,901
    Quote Originally Posted by Navafan29 View Post
    Imo this is a great deal. Kelly can start and relief pitch. Craig can be a fantastic hitter once he gets going. Surprised we didn't have to give up more for these two. If we play moneyball to get a starting rotation again (if that's even possible) we can win the division next year.
    I don't think there's much of a good way to make this trade look good. Cespedes I could kind of defend, but this trade no.

  11. #11
    Your pal, Pal Palodios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    13,946
    I am floored by this deal. I don't get it, my brain hurts just trying to comprehend why it was made. It makes me want to stop being a Red Sox fan, because this season went from awful to otherworldly bad.

  12. #12
    Your pal, Pal Palodios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    13,946
    Also, the Red Sox are sending the Cardinals money.

    What is going on? Did Red Sox ownership make a deal with Cardinal ownership to throw the World Series? This deal is getting historically bad.

  13. #13
    Deity
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    20,491
    Awful trade!!! I am getting flashbacks of a former gm or this is all lucchino.

  14. #14
    Resident Old Fart Spudboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    24,394
    This is a real head scratcher. I have no idea why this deal was done.

    I think the Sox are very far off from being done "constructing" the future roster.

    I just do not understand the way they are deconstructing it now!

  15. #15
    Fight the Hate Dojji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    18,524
    Ironically, I actually see what Cherington is thinking here. I didn't want Craig for Lester, but Lackey is less valuable than Lester, and I see the point in going for a guy with utility on all 4 corners. And don't overlook Joe Kelly, he's looking like he might be a serviceable bottom of the rotation guy.

    With Lester the argument always was that if the deal wasn't good enough you could pay him what he wanted and keep him for at least another 3-4 years. Lackey was never a guy with that kind of option, so trading him for a younger veteran and a half decent young pitcing prospect to flesh out the rotation actually works for me.

    I mean this does mean Cespedes makes even less sense -- but don't be too surprised if the Red Sox turn Cespedes around before the deadline is over.
    If history tells us anything, the path to redeption for any bad baseball team is marked with a deep rotation of durable starters, a world class defense in both infield and outfield, a lineup that can generate runs in more than one way, a bullpen that won't steal defeat from the jaws of victory, and a top end catcher to hold the whole package together. These are the conditions by which victory is achieved, anything that does not accomplish these objectives is a waste of resources.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •