Register now to remove this ad

Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 147

Thread: Hernanez vs Pablo

  1. #91
    King of TalkSox a700hitter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    69,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmi View Post
    I have stated what I believe are Ben's bad moves many, many times. And yet, every time I say that Ben was not responsible for the Pablo signing, I get this comment from you.
    And you will continue to get this comment. If someone else in the organization suggested the signing an Ben thought it was a bad move, it was his job as the GM to convince them why it was a bad move. Either way, the fact that Pablo was signed is on Ben either. Because it was his idea or he was ineffective in doing his job of controlling personnel moves.
    The King of TalkSox has Spoken.

    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    Chaim, you are in the big leagues now. Drawing 10,000 fans a game is not going to cut it, and people don’t buy tickets to Fenway to talk about the Farm

    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    "Relief pitchers are a crapshoot." No, the truth is "Crapshoot pitchers are relievers."

  2. #92
    Resident Old Fart Spudboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    24,394
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmi View Post
    I have stated what I believe are Ben's bad moves many, many times. And yet, every time I say that Ben was not responsible for the Pablo signing, I get this comment from you.
    Well Ted is consistent at least! That has to count for something in such a random world!
    "Hating the Yankees like it's a religion since 94'" RIP Mike.


    "It's also a simple and indisputable fact that WAR isn't the be-all end-all in valuations, especially in real life. Wanna know why? Because an ace in run-prevention for 120 innings means more often than not, a sub-standard pitcher covering for the rest of the IP that pitcher fails to provide. You can't see value in a vacuum when a player does not provide full-time production."

  3. #93
    Deity Kimmi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    26,666
    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    And you will continue to get this comment. If someone else in the organization suggested the signing an Ben thought it was a bad move, it was his job as the GM to convince them why it was a bad move. Either way, the fact that Pablo was signed is on Ben either. Because it was his idea or he was ineffective in doing his job of controlling personnel moves.
    I have no problem with you disagreeing with my opinion that Ben is not at fault for the Pablo move, and supporting your opinion with your own argument, as you did in this post.

    The snarky and incorrect comment, complete with an eye roll, in your previous post serves no purpose.

  4. #94
    King of TalkSox a700hitter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    69,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Spudboy View Post
    Well Ted is consistent at least! That has to count for something in such a random world!
    I have repeatable skills, and I am clutch.
    The King of TalkSox has Spoken.

    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    Chaim, you are in the big leagues now. Drawing 10,000 fans a game is not going to cut it, and people don’t buy tickets to Fenway to talk about the Farm

    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    "Relief pitchers are a crapshoot." No, the truth is "Crapshoot pitchers are relievers."

  5. #95
    Resident Old Fart Spudboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    24,394
    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    I have repeatable skills, and I am clutch.
    Maybe even clutch!
    "Hating the Yankees like it's a religion since 94'" RIP Mike.


    "It's also a simple and indisputable fact that WAR isn't the be-all end-all in valuations, especially in real life. Wanna know why? Because an ace in run-prevention for 120 innings means more often than not, a sub-standard pitcher covering for the rest of the IP that pitcher fails to provide. You can't see value in a vacuum when a player does not provide full-time production."

  6. #96
    King of TalkSox a700hitter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    69,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmi View Post
    I have no problem with you disagreeing with my opinion that Ben is not at fault for the Pablo move, and supporting your opinion with your own argument, as you did in this post.

    The snarky and incorrect comment, complete with an eye roll, in your previous post serves no purpose.
    Lighten up. It is just fun.
    The King of TalkSox has Spoken.

    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    Chaim, you are in the big leagues now. Drawing 10,000 fans a game is not going to cut it, and people don’t buy tickets to Fenway to talk about the Farm

    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    "Relief pitchers are a crapshoot." No, the truth is "Crapshoot pitchers are relievers."

  7. #97
    Deity Kimmi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    26,666
    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    And you will continue to get this comment. If someone else in the organization suggested the signing an Ben thought it was a bad move, it was his job as the GM to convince them why it was a bad move. Either way, the fact that Pablo was signed is on Ben either. Because it was his idea or he was ineffective in doing his job of controlling personnel moves.
    As to your argument, Ben can try to convince ownership all he wants about whether a move is bad or not. Ultimately, ownership will do what they want. Even the best GM would not be able to 'control' personnel moves if ownership has their minds set on it.

  8. #98
    King of TalkSox a700hitter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    69,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmi View Post
    As to your argument, Ben can try to convince ownership all he wants about whether a move is bad or not. Ultimately, ownership will do what they want. Even the best GM would not be able to 'control' personnel moves if ownership has their minds set on it.
    You build excuse upon excuse for Ben. First of all, you have no reliable evidence that Pablo wasn't Ben's idea except that you think it wasn't his type of deal. Then when I point out that he would be an ineffective GM for not being able to convince ownership that it was a bad deal, you suggest that he was bullied into it. Again, you have no knowledge or evidence regarding the dynamics of his relationship with ownership. Also, if what you say is true, why would he get any credit for the good moves. Weren't those just as likely dictated by upper management?
    The King of TalkSox has Spoken.

    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    Chaim, you are in the big leagues now. Drawing 10,000 fans a game is not going to cut it, and people don’t buy tickets to Fenway to talk about the Farm

    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    "Relief pitchers are a crapshoot." No, the truth is "Crapshoot pitchers are relievers."

  9. #99
    Deity
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    10,490
    Old school and traditional here - i like a little more power coming out of my third baseman but their is no doubt in my mind but what Hernandez can get it done in the field. When Eck was talking about it the other night, i was listening. Sandoval will get another shot I'm sure but for how long that is the question. I don't think that it will be the $ that drive the decision. They want the best players on the field! lol

  10. #100
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Posts
    1,038
    Quote Originally Posted by cp176 View Post
    Old school and traditional here - i like a little more power coming out of my third baseman but their is no doubt in my mind but what Hernandez can get it done in the field. When Eck was talking about it the other night, i was listening. Sandoval will get another shot I'm sure but for how long that is the question. I don't think that it will be the $ that drive the decision. They want the best players on the field! lol
    They proved it last year that money was not the driving force, When they played Holt over Castillo and Shaw over Sandavol to start the season.

  11. #101
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41,714
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmi View Post
    I have no problem with you disagreeing with my opinion that Ben is not at fault for the Pablo move, and supporting your opinion with your own argument, as you did in this post.

    The snarky and incorrect comment, complete with an eye roll, in your previous post serves no purpose.
    I blame Cherington for Sandoval, as well as Castillo. But really, like the Reset Button Trade (which i also credit Cherington for), we do find out Henry and Co. were calling a lot of shots then. Crawford being another. But it's just so much easier to credit/blame the GM for his tenure.

    Overall I still think Cherington did a good job despite my immediate dislike of the Sandoval signing..
    Last edited by notin; 04-29-2017 at 10:41 AM.

  12. #102
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    66,425
    Henry said that he adamantly didn't want Crawford.
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    ( I won't say the "C word.")

  13. #103
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,692
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    Henry said that he adamantly didn't want Crawford.
    I read that, but I also think it was Henry who gave Lucchino more power than Ben (and too much with Theo).

  14. #104
    Deity
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    10,490
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    I blame Cherington for Sandoval, as well as Castillo. But really, like the Reset Button Trade (which i also credit Cherington for), we do find out Henry and Co. were calling a lot of shots then. Crawford being another. But it's just so much easier to credit/blame the GM for his tenure.

    Overall I still think Cherington did a good job despite my immediate dislike of the Sandoval signing..
    I'm just always amazed that people still blame anybody for any of the crap signings. i am much more concerned with what we do with what we have. I'm hoping that Bogaerts feels the same way. Papi is gone- end of story.

  15. #105
    Deity
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    10,490
    I'm also going to add that some of you think that Hernandez is barely average in the field. Based on what precisely? He looks better than just average to me over there.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •