Register now to remove this ad

Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 153

Thread: Lin

  1. #76
    MVP Emp9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,516
    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    I really don't think anyone proposed moving XB to 3B for Lin. Under discussion is whether we look for a SS instead of a 3B going forward.
    I hear Asdrubal Cabrera might be available if thats the case

  2. #77
    Fight the Hate Dojji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    18,524
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmi View Post
    Counting on Sandoval with no decent backup plan was a huge mistake, I agree. I had no issues with trading Shaw, however. The deal looks very bad right now, but Shaw was horrible for most of the season last year.

    In Dombrowski's defense in counting on Pablo,

    1. I don't think it was unrealistic to think that Pablo could improve upon the numbers put up by last year's 3B, which were last in baseball. That's how bad Shaw was last year.
    2. I don't think anyone could expect both Holt and Marco to be out for most of the season.
    "horrible" is a relative statement. 2016 Shaw would have been light years ahead of anyone we have at the position now.
    If history tells us anything, the path to redeption for any bad baseball team is marked with a deep rotation of durable starters, a world class defense in both infield and outfield, a lineup that can generate runs in more than one way, a bullpen that won't steal defeat from the jaws of victory, and a top end catcher to hold the whole package together. These are the conditions by which victory is achieved, anything that does not accomplish these objectives is a waste of resources.

  3. #78
    Legend S5Dewey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    ME
    Posts
    6,978
    As I've said, I'm not lobbying for Lin to be our SS. I just think that we're hamstringing ourselves when we decide to eliminate a possibility that might make the team better in the name of keeping one player comfortable. Players change positions. Benintendi was a CF'er. Mookie was a 2B-man.

    My problem is with any player who 'pulls a Derek Jeter' and essentially refuses to move off his position even though it could make the team better. - and gets away with it! Tail wagging dog.
    It's a mere moment in a man's life between the All-Star game and the Old Timer's game.
    -Vin Scully

  4. #79
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,944
    Quote Originally Posted by Dojji View Post
    Considering that a lot of scouts said that XB was too big and too thick bodied to stick at SS, being able to play at replacement level or better defensively for multiple seasons is a sign of some pretty hard work. I'm sorry that not being an elite defender makes you think he isn't working, but that's a ridiculous sentiment when applied to anyone. Hard work should be measured compared to a player's own personal limits, not some arbitrary statisticall standard, and by that analysis it's clear that XB is working pretty darn hard. He's maintaining himself at a position not everyone thought he could play, and he's defending at a consistently acceptable level. That's enough for me.
    I never said Bogey is "not working" at SS. I was just talking about his defense not improving at all over his ML career. You'd think his dislike for playing 3B and his hard work ethic would have meant we'd see some growth on defense. One could argue there has even been slight regression on defense.

    Bogey's offense makes him a clear and significant plus at SS. His defense is not bad, and even though I have a very strong philosophy of having great defense at the SS position, I am not for moving Bogey to 3B for someone like Marrero or LIn. To me, his defense is "acceptable", but barely so.I'm not calling for DD to try and trade for a SS, so Bogey can be moved to 3B. Not at all. I see Devers as our future 3Bman and Bogey staying at SS for a long time, but if we ever do get a great fielding SS that can hit, I'd consider the move. (Note: I used the word "consider" not certainly would move him, too.)

  5. #80
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,944
    Quote Originally Posted by cp176 View Post
    I have and will continue to be a Shaw fan. I would say though that trading him was not an unpopular move for the clear majority of posters here as I recall. If my memory is still working, what I remember mostly is the criticism of him as his stats seemed to dip as the season wore on. Was not a problem for me.
    He lost the starting job at the end of last year due to an almost unbelievably long slump. That wasn't a problem?

  6. #81
    Fight the Hate Dojji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    18,524
    There are plenty of acceptable options at 3B without getting exotic.

    We don't need an all star and don't really have the assets to obtain one. What we need is adequacy at the third base position. An all star would be great but all we need 3B to be is something other than a sucking chest wound.

    Going back to an offseason idea of Moonslav's, picking up Todd Frazier from a White Sox club going nowhere would be a solid idea, I doubt he'd be too expensive considering he's on the last year of his deal on a losing team and the White Sox are considering a transition to Yoan Moncada at his position, and we've proven we can make fair deals with the White Sox. That looks like a deal that ought to be doable for a reasonable price in assets. Heck maybe the White Sox think they can save Blake Swihart.

    Adrian Beltre is also a solid choice if the Rangers will spare him, he's made a strong return to their lineup after his injury and I think it's fair to say he's likely healthy, and he's been highly productive in Boston before. The Rangers are 1 game over .500 and not too far off wild card pace and they may consider themselves in contention, so that may not be an option at the deadline, but if they take a dive in the standings between now and 7/31 that becomes an option.

    Basically there's a couple things we can potentially do to increase our left side of the infield offense without screwing over an elite SS. If they fail then maybe it's time to go exocit, but the best roster moves are the ones that are least disruptive to the team, adding the most while subtracting the least, and if a veteran 3B is available, getting a SS instead fails that test.
    Last edited by Dojji; 06-26-2017 at 09:09 AM.
    If history tells us anything, the path to redeption for any bad baseball team is marked with a deep rotation of durable starters, a world class defense in both infield and outfield, a lineup that can generate runs in more than one way, a bullpen that won't steal defeat from the jaws of victory, and a top end catcher to hold the whole package together. These are the conditions by which victory is achieved, anything that does not accomplish these objectives is a waste of resources.

  7. #82
    Fight the Hate Dojji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    18,524
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    I never said Bogey is "not working" at SS. I was just talking about his defense not improving at all over his ML career. You'd think his dislike for playing 3B and his hard work ethic would have meant we'd see some growth on defense. One could argue there has even been slight regression on defense.
    You're ignoring the problem of maintenance. Staying at an acceptable level defensively takes a certain work ethic when you're not naturally built for the position.

    Bogey's offense makes him a clear and significant plus at SS. His defense is not bad, and even though I have a very strong philosophy of having great defense at the SS position, I am not for moving Bogey to 3B for someone like Marrero or LIn. To me, his defense is "acceptable", but barely so.I'm not calling for DD to try and trade for a SS, so Bogey can be moved to 3B. Not at all. I see Devers as our future 3Bman and Bogey staying at SS for a long time, but if we ever do get a great fielding SS that can hit, I'd consider the move. (Note: I used the word "consider" not certainly would move him, too.)
    That's fair.
    If history tells us anything, the path to redeption for any bad baseball team is marked with a deep rotation of durable starters, a world class defense in both infield and outfield, a lineup that can generate runs in more than one way, a bullpen that won't steal defeat from the jaws of victory, and a top end catcher to hold the whole package together. These are the conditions by which victory is achieved, anything that does not accomplish these objectives is a waste of resources.

  8. #83
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,944
    Quote Originally Posted by Dojji View Post
    "horrible" is a relative statement. 2016 Shaw would have been light years ahead of anyone we have at the position now.
    The point was that he was horrible for most of the season. The word "most" might be debatable, but in my opinion, the word "horrible" was an accurate description of Shaw's play at the end of the season last year.

    His defense was surprisingly decent last year at 3B, but I'm not sure one could expect that to continue. By the way, his UZR/150 this year is at -9.3 (third worst in MLB). He really is much better at 1B.

    Here are his numbers:

    2nd half: 59 games/193 PAs
    .194 7 23 (.619 OPS)

    Our 2017 3B numbers right now: 75 gams/286 PAs
    .198 7 29 (.568 OPS)

    Yes, Shaw looked slightly better over this year's clown carousel, but not by much.

    (Note: 59 games is not "most of the season".)

    Now, if you tighten up the sample size to just August and September, Shaw was no better than this year's 3Bmen:

    AUG: .542 OPS
    SEP: .602 OPS

    That was 150 PAs of .570 batting (.184 4 16).

    It's hard not to call that HORRIBLE!


    Last edited by moonslav59; 06-26-2017 at 10:00 AM.

  9. #84
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,944
    You're ignoring the problem of maintenance. Staying at an acceptable level defensively takes a certain work ethic when you're not naturally built for the position.

    I think the scouts and I were wrong about Bogey not "being built to play SS." He has not "filled out". His current body type should not be a factor in improving his defense at SS.

  10. #85
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,944
    There are plenty of acceptable options at 3B without getting exotic.

    We don't need an all star and don't really have the assets to obtain one. What we need is adequacy at the third base position. An all star would be great but all we need 3B to be is something other than a sucking chest wound.

    Going back to an offseason idea of Moonslav's, picking up Todd Frazier from a White Sox club going nowhere would be a solid idea, I doubt he'd be too expensive considering he's on the last year of his deal on a losing team and the White Sox are considering a transition to Yoan Moncada at his position, and we've proven we can make fair deals with the White Sox. That looks like a deal that ought to be doable for a reasonable price in assets. Heck maybe the White Sox think they can save Blake Swihart.

    I'm not longer a supporter of trading for Frazier. He's having a bad year, and he's historically a much worse second half hitter. His defense is still solid. He's probably better than what we have, assuming Devers is targeted for 2018, so if we could get him for cheap, which is doubtful, I might consider him.

    Adrian Beltre is also a solid choice if the Rangers will spare him, he's made a strong return to their lineup after his injury and I think it's fair to say he's likely healthy, and he's been highly productive in Boston before. The Rangers are 1 game over .500 and not too far off wild card pace and they may consider themselves in contention, so that may not be an option at the deadline, but if they take a dive in the standings between now and 7/31 that becomes an option.

    Will be way too costly.

    Basically there's a couple things we can potentially do to increase our left side of the infield offense without screwing over an elite SS. If they fail then maybe it's time to go exocit, but the best roster moves are the ones that are least disruptive to the team, adding the most while subtracting the least, and if a veteran 3B is available, getting a SS instead fails that test.

    I'm not advoacting moving Bogey to 3B, like I was when we had Iggy, but a chance at greatly improving SS defense is nothing to ignore either.

  11. #86
    Legend S5Dewey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    ME
    Posts
    6,978
    ..and since I didn't bring that guy's name up....

    I see no doubt that this team would be better than it is with Bogy and Iggy on the left side, regardless of which position they're at. And cheaper, too.
    It's a mere moment in a man's life between the All-Star game and the Old Timer's game.
    -Vin Scully

  12. #87
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    66,611
    And if the Sox really want to move Xander to 3B, it will be done during an offseason, not in June/July.
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    ( I won't say the "C word.")

  13. #88
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,944
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    And if the Sox really want to move Xander to 3B, it will be done during an offseason, not in June/July.
    I totally agree. It's not happening this year. It's extremely unlike over this winter as well.

  14. #89
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    66,611
    Quote Originally Posted by S5Dewey View Post
    ..and since I didn't bring that guy's name up....

    I see no doubt that this team would be better than it is with Bogy and Iggy on the left side, regardless of which position they're at. And cheaper, too.
    Iggy is a great defender

    Definitely better hitter than Devers
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    ( I won't say the "C word.")

  15. #90
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    66,611
    http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.asp...rs=0&sort=21,d

    Iggy's bat is so bad that it's laughable that anyone would want him back. He's no Ozzie Smith.
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    ( I won't say the "C word.")

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •