Register now to remove this ad

Page 50 of 53 FirstFirst ... 404849505152 ... LastLast
Results 736 to 750 of 786

Thread: Stanton or Votto

  1. #736
    Legend S5Dewey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    ME
    Posts
    6,977
    Quote Originally Posted by cp176 View Post
    I'm proud of you for asking that question! I think that that is the answer you probably expected as well. Butterfield is a good man. With people like him sometimes you can read between he lines. My guess is that deep inside, he didn't have much fun in that clubhouse this year. He deserves better.
    Contrary to the rumor I'd heard, Butter did want to stay with the Sox. He said he'd contacted DD and told him that since he was from Maine he'd been a Sox fan all his life and wanted to, as he put it, "Be buried in a Red Sox uniform". He also said that he "understood" the need for Cora to bring in his own people so he wasn't surprised that the Sox didn't rehire him.
    It's a mere moment in a man's life between the All-Star game and the Old Timer's game.
    -Vin Scully

  2. #737
    Deity Slasher9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,248
    The Giancarlo Stanton renovations at Fenway have commenced.....

    green monster.jpg
    other names i have posted under: none

  3. #738
    Deity Kimmi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    26,666
    Quote Originally Posted by Slasher9 View Post
    lol. if that is the case i wish he did that before giving price the worst contract ever written.
    The point was brought up that Dombrowski must not have really wanted Stanton because if he did, he would have offered enough to get the deal done, overpaying quite a bit if necessary. If Dombrowski has his sights set on a player, he will get him. We keep hearing that Stanton did not want to come to Boston, which might be true, but the impression that I'm getting from what I've read recently is that the Sox did not really engage that seriously in talks.

  4. #739
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,694
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmi View Post
    The point was brought up that Dombrowski must not have really wanted Stanton because if he did, he would have offered enough to get the deal done, overpaying quite a bit if necessary. If Dombrowski has his sights set on a player, he will get him. We keep hearing that Stanton did not want to come to Boston, which might be true, but the impression that I'm getting from what I've read recently is that the Sox did not really engage that seriously in talks.
    We'll be left to wonder if DD had seriously engaged in talks maybe Stanton might have had the Sox on his list.

    I doubt it, but there might always be a "what if..." feeling.

  5. #740
    Deity
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    10,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Kimmi View Post
    The point was brought up that Dombrowski must not have really wanted Stanton because if he did, he would have offered enough to get the deal done, overpaying quite a bit if necessary. If Dombrowski has his sights set on a player, he will get him. We keep hearing that Stanton did not want to come to Boston, which might be true, but the impression that I'm getting from what I've read recently is that the Sox did not really engage that seriously in talks.
    so it appears that DD has his sights set on Martinez - will he get him?

  6. #741
    Legend SCM33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    5,697
    Quote Originally Posted by Slasher9 View Post
    He was a 2.8 WAR player last season in 133 games. Tell me more about him being "over rated"

    "Below average offensive player"??? He has a 6.5 OWAR in 5 seasons. On what planet is that below avg?

    To compare him to Darren Lewis is ridiculously stupid. Lewis had a 10 WAR over 13 MLB seaosons. JBj has 10.8 in 5....
    Darren Lewis with power. I didnt compare him to Darren Lewis. I compared him to Darren Lewis with power, and its not so ridiculous if you think about it. Players like JBJ are the reason why we don't get players like Stanton.

    Redsox fans/FO overhype/overrate their middling talent to the point that better players go to smarter teams willing to make a move, or take a risk.

  7. #742
    Resident Old Fart Spudboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    24,394
    Quote Originally Posted by SCM33 View Post
    Darren Lewis with power. I didnt compare him to Darren Lewis. I compared him to Darren Lewis with power, and its not so ridiculous if you think about it. Players like JBJ are the reason why we don't get players like Stanton.

    Redsox fans/FO overhype/overrate their middling talent to the point that better players go to smarter teams willing to make a move, or take a risk.
    And for less money!
    "Hating the Yankees like it's a religion since 94'" RIP Mike.


    "It's also a simple and indisputable fact that WAR isn't the be-all end-all in valuations, especially in real life. Wanna know why? Because an ace in run-prevention for 120 innings means more often than not, a sub-standard pitcher covering for the rest of the IP that pitcher fails to provide. You can't see value in a vacuum when a player does not provide full-time production."

  8. #743
    Legend
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    7,360
    Quote Originally Posted by SCM33 View Post
    Darren Lewis with power. I didnt compare him to Darren Lewis. I compared him to Darren Lewis with power, and its not so ridiculous if you think about it. Players like JBJ are the reason why we don't get players like Stanton.

    Redsox fans/FO overhype/overrate their middling talent to the point that better players go to smarter teams willing to make a move, or take a risk.
    Bradley is a quality starter.

    We did not get Stanton because Stanton did not want to go to Boston, period. And since Jeter was not exactly fielding Stanton's input - the opportunity to expand his horizons was largely absent. If there was someone in the trade market worth trading JBJ, they'd deal him.

  9. #744
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41,717
    Quote Originally Posted by SCM33 View Post
    Darren Lewis with power. I didnt compare him to Darren Lewis. I compared him to Darren Lewis with power, and its not so ridiculous if you think about it. Players like JBJ are the reason why we don't get players like Stanton.

    Redsox fans/FO overhype/overrate their middling talent to the point that better players go to smarter teams willing to make a move, or take a risk.
    Bradley is a very, very good outfielder.

    But the sillier part of this post is thinking how any fan overhyping or overrating has anything to do woth not getting Stanton. Seriously?

  10. #745
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41,717
    Quote Originally Posted by cp176 View Post
    so it appears that DD has his sights set on Martinez - will he get him?
    Not if we don't rearrange the OF....

  11. #746
    King of TalkSox a700hitter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    69,774
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    Not if we don't rearrange the OF....
    If we get J.D., I think Bradley will be traded for Abreu.
    The King of TalkSox has Spoken.

    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    Chaim, you are in the big leagues now. Drawing 10,000 fans a game is not going to cut it, and people don’t buy tickets to Fenway to talk about the Farm

    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    "Relief pitchers are a crapshoot." No, the truth is "Crapshoot pitchers are relievers."

  12. #747
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41,717
    Quote Originally Posted by a700hitter View Post
    If we get J.D., I think Bradley will be traded for Abreu.
    Possible.

    Bradley is easily worth Abreu in a trade, with the only stumbling block being whether or not Hahn wants a player who only has 3 arb years left. Reportedly he balked at this offer once already this off-season.

    If that is the case, deal Bradley for prospects or younger players (Cubs? Indians? Giants?) and send them to the White Sox...

  13. #748
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,694
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    Possible.

    Bradley is easily worth Abreu in a trade, with the only stumbling block being whether or not Hahn wants a player who only has 3 arb years left. Reportedly he balked at this offer once already this off-season.

    If that is the case, deal Bradley for prospects or younger players (Cubs? Indians? Giants?) and send them to the White Sox...
    Yes, and maybe add Travis or Ockimey, if needed.

  14. #749
    Deity
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    10,490
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    Not if we don't rearrange the OF....
    This is not some new revelation. Anyone who has followed the story knows that it has always been J.D's preference to play in the field. Unless DD can do a good job of stick handling the situation, Bradley has been in the trade lights for quite some time. I would hate to see him go but sign two good free agents and package him up and trade for more pitching and there you have it. Sounds easy doesn't it. I would also say that Martinez isn't the poorest fielding outfielder in the world either but I don't agree that the stats tell the whole story about Bogaerts at short either. They are both adequate or better and sometimes the trade offs with the bats are just worth it. Now - hit me with all of the statistical mumbo jumbo to show me just how wrong I am - Let's go.

  15. #750
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,694
    Quote Originally Posted by cp176 View Post
    This is not some new revelation. Anyone who has followed the story knows that it has always been J.D's preference to play in the field. Unless DD can do a good job of stick handling the situation, Bradley has been in the trade lights for quite some time. I would hate to see him go but sign two good free agents and package him up and trade for more pitching and there you have it. Sounds easy doesn't it. I would also say that Martinez isn't the poorest fielding outfielder in the world either but I don't agree that the stats tell the whole story about Bogaerts at short either. They are both adequate or better and sometimes the trade offs with the bats are just worth it. Now - hit me with all of the statistical mumbo jumbo to show me just how wrong I am - Let's go.
    I'm okay with Bogey at SS, and I don't need stats to support my position that he is, at best, a below average defender. Now that Cozart is gone, I see no option that looks good enough out there to warrant switching two player's positions (XB>SS & RD>1B/DH).

    With our infield defense looking suspect, especially with Pedey our and devers learning on the fly, I'd hate to weaken our OF defense and CF to boot, but I realize our middle-order offense needs a big boost- mostly powerwise.

    I'm not buying into the idea that we need to pay JD more to get him to agree to play DH. I'd offer him the max we think he's worth (maybe $155M/5) and tell Bore-A$$ take it or leave it. We might even have to give him a drop dead date, so we don't lose out on other options by waiting and waiting.

    If we sign JD and Morrison, and then trade JBJ (and others like Holt, Marrero, Swihart or Travis/Ockimey plus maybe a low prospect or two) for a quality SP'er, I'd say we improved enough to be a top contender. I'd rather sign JD to DH, keep JBJ and then just sign a quality SP'er. Maybe add a cheap, 1 year guy like Duda to support HRam at 1B and offer a back-up DH when JD plays the OF.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •