Incorrect assumption. I do recall him being hated by many for the Fosse hit and for his never-quit style. As I stated though, that has no bearing on him being in the hall or not.Originally Posted by Jayhawk Bill;310694;
In response to my saying Rose played harder than others, you stated that Rose "took out Ray Fosse hard at home plate" and "I don't consider that to be a mark of HOF caliber integrity. The hit, while over the top, doesn't represent a lack of HOF integrity...and the cite you've provided is ineffective...I don't see anywhere where the article says anything about the hit being a knock on his HOF-caliber integrity as a player. Being despised for playing hard, which is supported by the article you referred to, is much different than being viewed as short on HOF integrity. However, thanks for posting a cite that supports my position that he played to win...I owe ya one.http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/ar...he-ballplayer/
Treder supports Pete Rose for the HOF, but the excerpt demonstrates my point: Rose was despised by many for his style of play long before the gambling scandal broke. It's tough finding other articles to link from those pre-Internet days, but trust me, there were many.
After the fact, you're attempting to conveniently redefine the meaning of your statements.You wanted to focus on playing career: my point is that Rose's playing career was marked by controversy, in contrast to Mark McGwire's. I've demonstrated that point.
You stated "I had thought that Bonds et al had used steroids and other PEDs to help their teams win, while Rose had, by his actions, questioned the integrity of the game as a contest where both sides were trying their utmost to win." To that I replied that as a player Rose played as much, or more, to win as anyone, and IMO was more win-oriented than the 'roid boys. Now you say you simply meant that his career was filled with controversy? That doesn't fly.
Your contention was that they did it to help their teams. Now you say you don't know what they were thinking. Well, which is it?I don't know what they were thinking. I suspect that you don't, either: you feel that you know, but that's an opinion.
Assuming it is your opinion, as you stated in your 2:18 pm post, that players use PEDs to help their teams, I suppose you believe Andy Pettitte's story that he felt an obligation to get back and help his team? I disagree with your assertion that players primarily use PEDs to help their teams...rather I believe players who use PEDs generally do so to help themselves in terms of stats, adulation, and money.
We can agree to disagree on this one.