These bitches at YES; trying to copy BDD [Archive] - Talksox

yeszir

01-18-2005, 08:48 PM

It has long since been acknowledged that YES is a subpar website.

There they go, complimenting a Red Sox creation, but should any single fan, regardless of knowledge or intellect, venture over there, BAM its a shitstorm.

Edit: Their signatures are also WAAAAAY too big. I can't read a damn thing!

Plumpamania

01-20-2005, 02:40 PM

Yesnetwork boards are hilarious! Right Curt38...I mean BoSox Rule :-D

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 05:25 PM

LOL typical mess boards.

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 05:31 PM

Yesnetwork boards are hilarious! Right Curt38...I mean BoSox Rule :-D
He finally stopped posting there I guess. He had about 500 in 3 days.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 05:38 PM

He finally stopped posting there I guess. He had about 500 in 3 days.
What do you expect trying to post dumb cunts like that wrong?

They think Jeter is good defenseively, they think the Yanks system isn't the worst in the game, and they think Pedro got $17.5 million in arbitration last year. Good stuff.

You know, the fact that they think they know baseball is just funny.

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 07:43 PM

What do you expect trying to post dumb cunts like that wrong?

They think Jeter is good defenseively, they think the Yanks system isn't the worst in the game, and they think Pedro got $17.5 million in arbitration last year. Good stuff.

You know, the fact that they think they know baseball is just funny.
Jeter is better than half defensively,and yankees do have the worst farm system.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 07:52 PM

Jeter is arguably the worst defensive SS in baseball.

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 07:54 PM

Jeter is arguably the worst defensive SS in baseball.
LOL, funny stuff.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 07:55 PM

LOL, funny stuff. I know, huh? How funny is it that the coaches voted the worst defensive SS to a Gold Glove? I know you're more puzzled than me. http://forums.rajah.com/images/smilies/rofl.gif

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 07:58 PM

I know, huh? How funny is it that the coaches voted the worst defensive SS to a Gold Glove? I know you're more puzzled than me. http://forums.rajah.com/images/smilies/rofl.gif
No, I was laughing because your bias is at an all time high.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:01 PM

He's not good. http://forums.rajah.com/images/smilies/shifty.gif

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 08:22 PM

He's not good. http://forums.rajah.com/images/smilies/shifty.gif
He's better than half.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:36 PM

CAREER
Fielding Runs Above Replacement: 79 (Average SS has 33/year)
Fielding Runs Above Average: -127
Rate (Fielding Production): 90 (10% below average)

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 08:38 PM

CAREER
Fielding Runs Above Replacement: 79 (Average SS has 33/year)
Fielding Runs Above Average: -127
Rate (Fielding Production): 90 (10% below average)
Is this career wise?

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:40 PM

Are you that dense?

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 08:42 PM

Are you that dense?
Obviously it's inflated after he separated his shoulder. He will always be in my mind better than half. Best I agree best is laughable, worst is laughable as well. He's in the middle.

Zenny

01-20-2005, 08:45 PM

Is this career wise?
No, that big "CAREER" he wrote at the top of the post means 2004. Dumbass.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:49 PM

Obviously it's inflated after he separated his shoulder. He will always be in my mind better than half. Best I agree best is laughable, worst is laughable as well. He's in the middle. HAHA. You think one year will skew his stats?

Fielding Runs Above Replacement (33 is average, so don't think these are good because they're above "replacement")
1995: 1
1996: 9
1997: 10
1998: 14
1999: 7
2000: 3
2001: 5
2002: 6
2003: -2
2004: 26
2005: 8 (Prediction)

Fielding Runs Above Average
1995: -2
1996: -14
1997: -15
1998: -10
1999: -17
2000: -20
2001: -17
2002: -17
2003: -19
2004: 26
2005: -5 (Prediction)

Rate (Fielding Production, 100 is average)
1995: 85
1996: 91
1997: 91
1998: 93
1999: 89
2000: 86
2001: 88
2002: 89
2003: 83
2004: 103
2005: 90 (Prediction)

There is no doubt in my mind he is going to fall back to Earth. You don't just jump that much in fielding value without it being a fluke. Very rarely do you improve in fielding 10+ years into your career.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:51 PM

No, that big "CAREER" he wrote at the top of the post means 2004. Dumbass. http://forums.netsports.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 08:53 PM

No, that big "CAREER" he wrote at the top of the post means 2004. Dumbass.
Wow, I didn't see it. Get over yourself.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:53 PM

Wow, I didn't see it. Get over yourself. You must post at the YES Boards.

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 08:53 PM

http://forums.netsports.com/images/smilies/laugh.gif
"I must laugh at all master Zenny's jokes."

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:54 PM

If they're funny, then hell, why not?

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 08:55 PM

You must post at the YES Boards.
Are you that dense? Obviously since I knew who the username "curt38" is. Anyway, the only thing we'll ever agree on, they suck.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:56 PM

Who are you there? I must know.

No response to Jeter's pathetic career numbers?

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 08:57 PM

HAHA. You think one year will skew his stats?

Fielding Runs Above Replacement (33 is average, so don't think these are good because they're above "replacement")
1995: 1
1996: 9
1997: 10
1998: 14
1999: 7
2000: 3
2001: 5
2002: 6
2003: -2
2004: 26
2005: 8 (Prediction)

Fielding Runs Above Average
1995: -2
1996: -14
1997: -15
1998: -10
1999: -17
2000: -20
2001: -17
2002: -17
2003: -19
2004: 26
2005: -5 (Prediction)

Rate (Fielding Production, 100 is average)
1995: 85
1996: 91
1997: 91
1998: 93
1999: 89
2000: 86
2001: 88
2002: 89
2003: 83
2004: 103
2005: 90 (Prediction)

There is no doubt in my mind he is going to fall back to Earth. You don't just jump that much in fielding value without it being a fluke. Very rarely do you improve in fielding 10+ years into your career.
Of course you do, or else you wouldn't be a sox fan.

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 08:59 PM

Of course you do, or else you wouldn't be a sox fan. Please.

Look at those numbers and tell me he's more likely to go 26/4/103 season than a 8/-5/90 seasons.

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 08:59 PM

Who are you there? I must know.

No response to Jeter's pathetic career numbers?
Pathetic, huh? What does that make nomar's? I'm 1Bgiambi there.

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 09:00 PM

Please.

Look at those numbers and tell me he's more likely to go 26/4/103 season than a 8/-5/90 seasons.
I think he will match that, or barley lower. And I think A rod has something to do with it.

yeszir

01-20-2005, 09:00 PM

Going by the stats you posted, BSR, Jeter's "jump" last year isnt even that spectacular. He was below average, still, in Fielding runs above replacement, and just above average in fielding production.

These stats mean nothing to be, however, since im no sabremetrics freak, but if anything proves that Jeter sucks I'm all for it!

BoSox Rule

01-20-2005, 09:01 PM

Pathetic, huh? What does that make nomar's? I'm 1Bgiambi there. A lot better than Jeter's.

FRAR
Nomar 121
Jeter 79

FRAA
Nomar -29
Jeter -127

Rate
Nomar 97
Jeter 90

Yanksin2010

01-20-2005, 09:07 PM

"sabremetrics are for losers."

Plumpamania

01-21-2005, 12:45 AM

"sabremetrics are for losers."

Lol okay so go buy someone to explain it for you...since you in the Yankee lifestyle anyways.

Yanksin2010

01-21-2005, 04:45 PM

Lol okay so go buy someone to explain it for you...since you in the Yankee lifestyle anyways.
i already know what it's all about and I don't agree with it.

BoSox Rule

01-21-2005, 05:16 PM

Because they prove Jeter is a sucky SS.

ahhchon

01-21-2005, 06:51 PM

correction: jeter is a sucky defensive ss.

john

p.s.- although a sucky ss jeter's career FPCT is actually better than renterias. but then again renteria isn't making 18 mill a season. :D

BoSox Rule

01-21-2005, 06:57 PM

correction: jeter is a sucky defensive ss. Well, I meant good hitter, sucky SS. Meaning only defensively.

Throw FLD% out the window.

2090

01-23-2005, 04:54 PM

Pathetic, huh? What does that make nomar's? I'm 1Bgiambi there.
I hear you were wishing death on A-Rod? Sad.

2090

01-23-2005, 04:55 PM

The bias on these boards make me laugh :lol: BoSox Rule gives Red Sox fans a bad, bad, name.

BoSox Rule

01-23-2005, 04:57 PM

The bias on these boards make me laugh :lol: BoSox Rule gives Red Sox fans a bad, bad, name. The funny thing is there is nothing you could to convince a non-Yankee fan that Jeter is a good defensive SS. You wouldn't even be able to convince some Yankee fans.

yeszir

01-23-2005, 04:58 PM

The bias on these boards make me laugh :lol: BoSox Rule gives Red Sox fans a bad, bad, name.
Its a Red Sox forum, we're supposed to be biased.

2090

01-23-2005, 04:59 PM

Jeter won the Gold Glove. It's over, done with. I thought you would be happy with your WS, but you just b!tch about other things that, frankly, shouldn't bother you.

BoSox Rule

01-23-2005, 05:00 PM

Jeter won the Gold Glove. It's over, done with. I thought you would be happy with your WS, but you just b!tch about other things that, frankly, shouldn't bother you. When coaches and managers decide the award, it should be taken as a grain of salt.

2090

01-23-2005, 05:00 PM

Its a Red Sox forum, we're supposed to be biased.
I have seen unbiased posters from each side on other websites.

2090

01-23-2005, 05:01 PM

When coaches and managers decide the award, it should be taken as a grain of salt.
Thank You! That should shut all those Javy fans up about him being "deserving" of the all star selection