Register now to remove this ad

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Is Ottavino right about the Babe?

  1. #1
    "Just one more thing..." Northern Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12,155

    Is Ottavino right about the Babe?

    That in today's game he'd hit a buck 80 with 8 HRs?

    http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/2...wipe-babe-ruth
    Priorities:
    1. Yankees lose
    2. Red Sox win

    Quote Originally Posted by joeycaps View Post
    So shut up because you have no idea on what you say on anything as evidence of some of your ridiculous posts.

  2. #2
    If you transplanted the Babe from 1925 to now and make no caveats for nutrition exercise, etc, yeah he probably would have. That being said, if he was born in 1990 or so and had access to nutritionists, gyms, analytics, etc he’d be amazing

  3. #3
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    47,248
    It's silly. Babe was a beast compared to his contemporaries and that's all that matters. The rest is time travel fantasy shit...entertaining in books by H G Wells and Vonnegut and Stephen King, but useless in reality.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  4. #4
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,699
    Nice start.

    Welcome back to your old hometown.

  5. #5
    Super, Duper Moderator Youk Of The Nation's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    19,286
    It's impossible to know for sure, but given that pitchers are throwing way, way harder than they were back then and balls aren't being reused all game until they're brown and spongy, I'd say he might have a point. Baseball is a hell of a lot different than it was back then.
    Quote Originally Posted by YANKEESRULE View Post
    Yea got hand it to the Sox, they just could not go queitly into the night. Well, they are just post-poning the inevitable.
    - From the 2004 ALCS Game 4 Gamethread. A reminder that no game is over until the final out is recorded, and things will always get better. Misspellings unchanged as a reminder that Yankees fans are just terrible.

  6. #6
    "Just one more thing..." Northern Star's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    12,155
    Quote Originally Posted by Youk Of The Nation View Post
    It's impossible to know for sure, but given that pitchers are throwing way, way harder than they were back then and balls aren't being reused all game until they're brown and spongy, I'd say he might have a point. Baseball is a hell of a lot different than it was back then.
    But he would have grown up with the new baseball, and therefore, I think he would have been better than Ottavino thinks.
    Priorities:
    1. Yankees lose
    2. Red Sox win

    Quote Originally Posted by joeycaps View Post
    So shut up because you have no idea on what you say on anything as evidence of some of your ridiculous posts.

  7. #7
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41,717
    He’s certainly wrong about Babe in how he describes him, which, while consistent with the footage and pictures from his later career, is apparently inaccurate with how he looked i his heyday...

  8. #8
    What with Pedro drilling him in the ass and Ottavino blowing him away on three pitches ; the Bambino must be choking on his hot dogs in heaven.

  9. #9
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41,717
    Quote Originally Posted by Northern Star View Post
    But he would have grown up with the new baseball, and therefore, I think he would have been better than Ottavino thinks.
    The trade off is he’d be about 125 years old....

  10. #10
    Super Moderator Jasonbay44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    18,927
    It’s impossible to know for sure, but I think I would bet on one of the greatest players of all time would hit a little better than .180 in today’s game.

  11. #11
    Deity Kimmi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    26,666
    On the flip side of things, could our current superstars, like Mookie and Trout, go back to Babe's era and be as good as they are today?

    You can't be too sure about that either.

  12. #12
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    47,248
    Seriously, Ottavino has to be a pinhead to make a statement like that.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  13. #13
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    47,248
    As a PITCHER for the Boston Red Sox, Babe won 89 games with a 2.19 ERA.

    So maybe, just maybe, he was a pretty decent all-around athlete, huh, Ottavino, you f'king clown?
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  14. #14
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41,717
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    As a PITCHER for the Boston Red Sox, Babe won 89 games with a 2.19 ERA.

    So maybe, just maybe, he was a pretty decent all-around athlete, huh, Ottavino, you f'king clown?
    One thing is for certain regardless of the differences in the game today vs a century ago. Ruth would do a better job hitting against Ottavino than Ottavino would do against Ruth...

  15. #15
    Pujols aces scientists' tests -- just like The Babe
    Aug 22, 2006
    Associated Press

    ST. LOUIS -- How does El Hombre match up against the Sultan
    of Swat?

    This spring, Washington University scientists, at the request of
    GQ magazine, put Cardinals slugger Albert Pujols through a series
    of tests similar to those given to Babe Ruth 85 years ago -- tests
    ranging from finger tapping, to visual responses, to bat speed.

    The results? Both men aced the tests, and their performances
    were strikingly similar.

    In 1921, psychologists at Columbia University put Ruth through
    tests to try to determine what made him great. He had faster than
    average reflexes, steady nerves, and superior sight and hearing.

    The same holds true for Pujols. At Washington University,
    clinical neuropsychologist Desiree White and cognitive psychologist
    Richard Abrams and their colleagues gave Pujols tests resembling
    the ones Ruth took. Both men were 26 and top hitters when they were
    tested.

    GQ features some of the results of the Pujols tests in its
    September issue.

    For one test, White put a piece of paper in front of Pujols.
    Capital letters were strewn about the page. White told Pujols to
    locate and cross out all of the As.

    White realized she'd never seen anyone scan the page the way
    Pujols did. Most people scan a page left to right, the way they do
    when they read. Pujols visually divided the page into sectors and
    searched each one briefly for the letters before moving on to the
    next sector. When he'd searched all sectors, he returned to the
    first and started over. It took him four rounds and a minute to
    complete the task.

    "I've never seen anyone scan that way, but it would be
    important on the baseball field," White said, noting the skill
    would allow Pujols to scan the field and know where everyone is
    without missing any action.

    In another test, Pujols replicated 133 symbols in a minute -- a
    testament to his hand-eye coordination. The test makers don't even
    list a score that high.

    http://www.espn.com/mlb/news/story?id=2557786

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •