Register now to remove this ad

Page 95 of 393 FirstFirst ... 45859394959697105145195 ... LastLast
Results 1,411 to 1,425 of 5886

Thread: A Realistic View at 2022: Part I

  1. #1411
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    41,826
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    How much does the catcher have to do with that bloated BABip we keep hearing about?
    Well he doesn’t do anything to stop it, now does he?

  2. #1412
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    Shocking that Vaz is even still with us! Somebody in the org isn't reading the data right, I guess...
    He's been cheap, until 2022. He's hit better than 75% of catchers.

    He frames and throws well.

    He blocks pitches well.

    All this outweighs the other stuff. Same as Bogey at SS.

    You guys act like I've been saying he should be benched or DFA'd.

    I've never even said he should play less.

    Stawmen.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  3. #1413
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,906
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    Just think at how much better Xander's range would be if the Sox had a new catcher! Renfroe would have zero errors if it wasn't for that dastardly VAZ! Devers' throwing issues? VAZ!!!!!
    Now, you are catching on.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  4. #1414
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    47,340
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    He's been cheap, until 2022. He's hit better than 75% of catchers.

    He frames and throws well.

    He blocks pitches well.

    All this outweighs the other stuff. Same as Bogey at SS.

    You guys act like I've been saying he should be benched or DFA'd.

    I've never even said he should play less.

    Stawmen.
    I don't think it's a straw man to say your adverse opinion of him and desire to replace him has a lot to do with CERA comparisons.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  5. #1415
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    I don't think it's a straw man to say your adverse opinion of him and desire to replace him has a lot to do with CERA comparisons.
    Of course it does, but I have never said he should be benched or play less. The CERA issues have not tilted the balance enough, to me. Now that he will be making $7M, my opinion has changed.

    Trading him makes sense.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  6. #1416
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    47,340
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    Of course it does, but I have never said he should be benched or play less. The CERA issues have not tilted the balance enough, to me. Now that he will be making $7M, my opinion has changed.

    Trading him makes sense.
    If CERA was as big a deal to the Red Sox as it is to you, they never would have let Leon go.

    Me and MVP just think you make too much of it. The CERA comparisons with Vaz and Plawecki are all over the place. They scream randomness. There's nothing that shows Vaz isn't doing a good job 'handling the staff'.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  7. #1417
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    66,611
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    If CERA was as big a deal to the Red Sox as it is to you, they never would have let Leon go.

    Me and MVP just think you make too much of it. The CERA comparisons with Vaz and Plawecki are all over the place. They scream randomness. There's nothing that shows Vaz isn't doing a good job 'handling the staff'.
    ^^^
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    ( I won't say the "C word.")

  8. #1418
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    If CERA was as big a deal to the Red Sox as it is to you, they never would have let Leon go.

    Me and MVP just think you make too much of it. The CERA comparisons with Vaz and Plawecki are all over the place. They scream randomness. There's nothing that shows Vaz isn't doing a good job 'handling the staff'.
    IMO, they kept Leon pretty long as a testament to his value as a catcher who maximizes pitcher results. They certainly did not keep him for his hitting.

    Plus, he started making about $2M a year, and they probably felt they could find a defensive catcher for cheaper. Now, Plawecki is getting near $2M and Vaz makes $7M, so let's see how they handle this.

    My comps between Vaz and whoever his back-up were are not "all over the place." I keep a consistent min sample size requirement that both catcher must reach to make the study. I compare pitcher by pitcher, which is how it is supposed to be done to take our unbalanced sample sizes, and I go over every year since Vaz has been our catcher.

    Yes, there is randomness. I have never claimed the numbers are all tied to pitcher-catcher relations, but when every single season shows 70-80% of the pitchers who meet the min requirements do better and many times much better with the catcher not named Vaz, I think it has meaning.

    Then, I never said that "meaning" supersedes or should supersede all other factors in valuing a catcher. I have never called for making Vaz the back-up.

    You guys are blowing up the significance I place on CERA and COPS data. I am merely saying it should be part of the placing value matrix, along with contract cost, offense and other defensive values.

    There is a lot of data that shows Vaz is not handling the staff as well as his back-up. That's not the same as saying he sucks handling the staff- just that he has not been as good as the other catcher. If Leon was great- maybe Vaz was still good.

    You can choose to deny it or try to misuse overall CERA data all you want, but facts are facts.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  9. #1419
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    66,611
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    You can choose to deny it or try to misuse overall CERA data all you want, but facts are facts.
    Use of CERA at all is misusing it. It is a stat with no value. Even you said it fraught with randomness.
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    ( I won't say the "C word.")

  10. #1420
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    47,340
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    My comps between Vaz and whoever his back-up were are not "all over the place."
    You're misreading what I said. I meant the 2021 data is all over the place.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

  11. #1421
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,906
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    Use of CERA at all is misusing it. It is a stat with no value. Even you said it fraught with randomness.
    Every stats is. It doesn't make them all meaningless.

    You don't think the fact that 75% of all pitchers have done better with Vaz's back up over a 6 or 7 year sample size has any meaning or value?

    It's even more pronounced in pitchers with hundreds of IP'd with 2+ catchers- sometimes a 1.00 or 1.50+ disparity.

    It's like saying less runs allowed with JBJ in the OF vs JD is totally random and meaningless.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  12. #1422
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    66,611
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    Every stats is. It doesn't make them all meaningless.

    You don't think the fact that 75% of all pitchers have done better with Vaz's back up over a 6 or 7 year sample size has any meaning or value?

    It's even more pronounced in pitchers with hundreds of IP'd with 2+ catchers- sometimes a 1.00 or 1.50+ disparity.

    It's like saying less runs allowed with JBJ in the OF vs JD is totally random and meaningless.
    He's only caught 500 innings with the Sox. How many pitchers have worked with him for "HUNDREDS" of innings. At most, it would be 2.

    Even then, you'd need to account for opposing lineups which would bring that already SSS even more meaningless.
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    ( I won't say the "C word.")

  13. #1423
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,906
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    He's only caught 500 innings with the Sox. How many pitchers have worked with him for "HUNDREDS" of innings. At most, it would be 2.

    Even then, you'd need to account for opposing lineups which would bring that already SSS even more meaningless.
    I'm talking about Vazquez and all the sample sizes that total in the hundreds for 2 or more Sox catchers- career sample sizes with 100+ IP with 2+ catchers. Here are a few:

    Price:
    4.27 Vaz (360 IP)
    2.96 Leon (204)


    Sale
    4.03 Vaz (114 IP)
    2.79 Leon (435)
    2.51 AJ P (226)

    Porcello
    4.96 Vaz (211 IP)
    4.19 Leon (577)
    4.93 Swihart (122)

    ERod
    4.22 Vaz (603)
    4.05 Leon (118)

    Buchholz
    4.44 Vaz (130)
    2.83 VMart (241)
    3.01 Leon (155)
    3.95 Salty (207)
    5.12 VTek (118)

    These are NOT SSS.
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  14. #1424
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    80,906
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    He's only caught 500 innings with the Sox. How many pitchers have worked with him for "HUNDREDS" of innings. At most, it would be 2.

    Even then, you'd need to account for opposing lineups which would bring that already SSS even more meaningless.
    Do you account for opposing pitchers and team defenses when comparing OPS between Betts and Verdugo?
    When you say it's gonna happen now
    When exactly do you mean?

  15. #1425
    Deity Bellhorn04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Halifax
    Posts
    47,340
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    I'm talking about Vazquez and all the sample sizes that total in the hundreds for 2 or more Sox catchers- career sample sizes with 100+ IP with 2+ catchers. Here are a few:

    Price:
    4.27 Vaz (360 IP)
    2.96 Leon (204)


    Sale
    4.03 Vaz (114 IP)
    2.79 Leon (435)
    2.51 AJ P (226)

    Porcello
    4.96 Vaz (211 IP)
    4.19 Leon (577)
    4.93 Swihart (122)

    ERod
    4.22 Vaz (603)
    4.05 Leon (118)

    Buchholz
    4.44 Vaz (130)
    2.83 VMart (241)
    3.01 Leon (155)
    3.95 Salty (207)
    5.12 VTek (118)

    These are NOT SSS.
    Some of those numbers are really old.

    So you're not allowing for improvement by Vaz.
    Championships since purchase by John Henry group: Red Sox 4 Yankees 1

    The Red Sox are 8-1 in their last 9 postseason games against the Yankees.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •