Register now to remove this ad

Page 11 of 165 FirstFirst ... 9101112132161111 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 2468

Thread: A Realistic View at 2022: Part III

  1. #151
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Ft Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    1,506
    Quote Originally Posted by mvp 78 View Post
    I agree, but they have to win a series first. It's May 12th and they still haven't done that yet.
    Wrong, they won the series vs detroit back in April.

  2. #152
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by Bellhorn04 View Post
    In between stands the dispassionate realist!
    Haha!!

  3. #153
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by moonslav59 View Post
    The problem with this list of players is that all but Vaz, and I guess Kike, at the moment, are big losses, and finding decent catchers is very difficult.

    However, with Price's money added on, I can't see why we can't replace these guys with the same type of quality and expectations, and it's not like bringing them all back is going to guarantee a better team. At most, we might stay even, since these guys are aging.

    There is a chance we get some ML ready prospects for these guys, like we did with ERod, long ago. We could also see us stockpiling prospects at the deadline, then trading some in the winter to fill the gaps free agency can't do, or will be too expensive to do.

    I'm not happy even thinking about a fire sale, but the mini fire sale of 2020 did work out pretty well, and this fire sale could/should bring back more than Pivetta & Seabold.

    Again, I'm not giving up, but I can't seem to block the idea of a fire sale out of my head.


    Your last sentence is exactly where I am. I actually think I'm tilting towards wanting it to happen because I think the health of the team could be so massively improved and I hate tanking.

    Yeah they're all losses, but I don't think we extend them before year out anyway, so we'd be in the same situation regardless - they're there in free agency if we want them. But now after a lot of prospects/MLB ready players in the house, too.

    I keep forgetting the Price money. If my math is correct that's near enough $100 million coming off the books. We'll have holes for sure, but a lot of money to fill them and a lot of talented prospects ready to trade or maybe slot in.

    Sale, Paxton, Whitlock, Pivetta is a decent starting 4, with Bello, Seabold and Houck in the wings, too. We trade some prospects for a great pitcher (or get one back in the sell off) and that's a nice rotation to build on, with talent behind.

    A massive plus would be if Duran and Casas show they're able to cut it in the bigs after the sell off. If they do, as you said, we'd still need a good catcher (maybe Wong will be ready as a no2?), a 2nd baseman, centre/right fielder. A power bat to play DH. You'd hope we'd get some options for an almost ready starting pitcher, young catcher and/or a 2nd baseman in any sell off.

    It's the fact so many teams will be buyers that keeps exciting me. Look at The Angels. If they keep it going and are in contention, what would they give up for Eovaldi if we assume all of his remaining contract? They finally have more pitching, but Eovaldi is the kind of guy that helps put you over. The Padres have prospects to burn, what would a JD or Bogey, do for them? Not that it's likely to happen, but how I'd love The Marlins to be in contention. They have starting pithing to burn at AAA.

    Bloom must feel like he's in an odd position. If we tank and the listed players hold their worth (or increase in Kike and Vaquez's cases), he'd likely be salivating at the deals he can make for those players. But at the same time, if we tank, surely his head will be on the block. He'd be on a very short leash at the very least.

  4. #154
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    34,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
    Your last sentence is exactly where I am. I actually think I'm tilting towards wanting it to happen because I think the health of the team could be so massively improved and I hate tanking.

    Yeah they're all losses, but I don't think we extend them before year out anyway, so we'd be in the same situation regardless - they're there in free agency if we want them. But now after a lot of prospects/MLB ready players in the house, too.

    I keep forgetting the Price money. If my math is correct that's near enough $100 million coming off the books. We'll have holes for sure, but a lot of money to fill them and a lot of talented prospects ready to trade or maybe slot in.

    Sale, Paxton, Whitlock, Pivetta is a decent starting 4, with Bello, Seabold and Houck in the wings, too. We trade some prospects for a great pitcher (or get one back in the sell off) and that's a nice rotation to build on, with talent behind.

    A massive plus would be if Duran and Casas show they're able to cut it in the bigs after the sell off. If they do, as you said, we'd still need a good catcher (maybe Wong will be ready as a no2?), a 2nd baseman, centre/right fielder. A power bat to play DH. You'd hope we'd get some options for an almost ready starting pitcher, young catcher and/or a 2nd baseman in any sell off.

    It's the fact so many teams will be buyers that keeps exciting me. Look at The Angels. If they keep it going and are in contention, what would they give up for Eovaldi if we assume all of his remaining contract? They finally have more pitching, but Eovaldi is the kind of guy that helps put you over. The Padres have prospects to burn, what would a JD or Bogey, do for them? Not that it's likely to happen, but how I'd love The Marlins to be in contention. They have starting pithing to burn at AAA.

    Bloom must feel like he's in an odd position. If we tank and the listed players hold their worth (or increase in Kike and Vaquez's cases), he'd likely be salivating at the deals he can make for those players. But at the same time, if we tank, surely his head will be on the block. He'd be on a very short leash at the very least.
    The Sox tried to get Jason Stallings last off-season. Maybe Carson Kelly will be the next target. (The rapid rise of Alek Thomas has pushed Daulton Varsho out of CF and back behind the plate.)

  5. #155
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Ft Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    1,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
    Your last sentence is exactly where I am. I actually think I'm tilting towards wanting it to happen because I think the health of the team could be so massively improved and I hate tanking.

    Yeah they're all losses, but I don't think we extend them before year out anyway, so we'd be in the same situation regardless - they're there in free agency if we want them. But now after a lot of prospects/MLB ready players in the house, too.

    I keep forgetting the Price money. If my math is correct that's near enough $100 million coming off the books. We'll have holes for sure, but a lot of money to fill them and a lot of talented prospects ready to trade or maybe slot in.

    Sale, Paxton, Whitlock, Pivetta is a decent starting 4, with Bello, Seabold and Houck in the wings, too. We trade some prospects for a great pitcher (or get one back in the sell off) and that's a nice rotation to build on, with talent behind.

    A massive plus would be if Duran and Casas show they're able to cut it in the bigs after the sell off. If they do, as you said, we'd still need a good catcher (maybe Wong will be ready as a no2?), a 2nd baseman, centre/right fielder. A power bat to play DH. You'd hope we'd get some options for an almost ready starting pitcher, young catcher and/or a 2nd baseman in any sell off.

    It's the fact so many teams will be buyers that keeps exciting me. Look at The Angels. If they keep it going and are in contention, what would they give up for Eovaldi if we assume all of his remaining contract? They finally have more pitching, but Eovaldi is the kind of guy that helps put you over. The Padres have prospects to burn, what would a JD or Bogey, do for them? Not that it's likely to happen, but how I'd love The Marlins to be in contention. They have starting pithing to burn at AAA.

    Bloom must feel like he's in an odd position. If we tank and the listed players hold their worth (or increase in Kike and Vaquez's cases), he'd likely be salivating at the deals he can make for those players. But at the same time, if we tank, surely his head will be on the block. He'd be on a very short leash at the very least.
    pivetta sucks and he's 29. sale is 33 and paxton is soon to be 34. Neither has shown the ability to stay healthy. At their ages, will they really be much more than back end starters after the rebuild?

  6. #156
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    The Sox tried to get Jason Stallings last off-season. Maybe Carson Kelly will be the next target. (The rapid rise of Alek Thomas has pushed Daulton Varsho out of CF and back behind the plate.)
    The Diamondbacks staying in the play off picture would be another very nice bonus. If we get big enough hauls back in any sell off, Murphy may be in play from the A's. He'd cost a pretty penny, however.

  7. #157
    Deity
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    34,235
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
    Your last sentence is exactly where I am. I actually think I'm tilting towards wanting it to happen because I think the health of the team could be so massively improved and I hate tanking.

    Yeah they're all losses, but I don't think we extend them before year out anyway, so we'd be in the same situation regardless - they're there in free agency if we want them. But now after a lot of prospects/MLB ready players in the house, too.

    I keep forgetting the Price money. If my math is correct that's near enough $100 million coming off the books. We'll have holes for sure, but a lot of money to fill them and a lot of talented prospects ready to trade or maybe slot in.

    Sale, Paxton, Whitlock, Pivetta is a decent starting 4, with Bello, Seabold and Houck in the wings, too. We trade some prospects for a great pitcher (or get one back in the sell off) and that's a nice rotation to build on, with talent behind.

    A massive plus would be if Duran and Casas show they're able to cut it in the bigs after the sell off. If they do, as you said, we'd still need a good catcher (maybe Wong will be ready as a no2?), a 2nd baseman, centre/right fielder. A power bat to play DH. You'd hope we'd get some options for an almost ready starting pitcher, young catcher and/or a 2nd baseman in any sell off.

    It's the fact so many teams will be buyers that keeps exciting me. Look at The Angels. If they keep it going and are in contention, what would they give up for Eovaldi if we assume all of his remaining contract? They finally have more pitching, but Eovaldi is the kind of guy that helps put you over. The Padres have prospects to burn, what would a JD or Bogey, do for them? Not that it's likely to happen, but how I'd love The Marlins to be in contention. They have starting pithing to burn at AAA.

    Bloom must feel like he's in an odd position. If we tank and the listed players hold their worth (or increase in Kike and Vaquez's cases), he'd likely be salivating at the deals he can make for those players. But at the same time, if we tank, surely his head will be on the block. He'd be on a very short leash at the very least.
    The Padres would have no interest in Bogaerts. They have so many shortstops now that they’re playing them all over the field.

    St. Louis makes more sense. Ditto Philadelphia (unless they’re selling too), and maybe Miami if the Sox eat some cash.

    If Boston is a seller and tries to deal Bogaerts, the good news is there won’t be a glut of talented shortstops up for sale…

  8. #158
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by JDavis76 View Post
    pivetta sucks and he's 29. sale is 33 and paxton is soon to be 34. Neither has shown the ability to stay healthy. At their ages, will they really be much more than back end starters after the rebuild?
    Pivetta has shown flashes. This year will show us what he's about. There are question marks, I don't disagree.

  9. #159
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by notin View Post
    The Padres would have no interest in Bogaerts. They have so many shortstops now that they’re playing them all over the field.

    St. Louis makes more sense. Ditto Philadelphia (unless they’re selling too), and maybe Miami if the Sox eat some cash.

    If Boston is a seller and tries to deal Bogaerts, the good news is there won’t be a glut of talented shortstops up for sale…
    I only mentioned the Padres as a possible landing spot for Bogey for the same reason I did JD - the DH spot. Not an exact fit though, I grant you.

    Edit: Jim Bowden mention the Cardinals for Bogey, in return for 2nd/3rd baseman Nolan Gorman.

  10. #160
    TalkSox Ascended Master mvp 78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    57,054
    Bogey/Lugo to Cards for Gorman
    Quote Originally Posted by Iron Sheik View Post
    Devers? Number 1! Mayer? Number 2? Bloom? Haack-ptooey!

  11. #161
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Ft Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    1,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
    Pivetta has shown flashes. This year will show us what he's about. There are question marks, I don't disagree.
    Flashes of what?!!

    He's got an ERA of 6.08 with a WHIP of 1.61 this year and a career ERA of 5.20 and a career WHIP of 1.40.

    Not exactly what I would call a building block.

  12. #162
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by JDavis76 View Post
    Flashes of what?!!

    He's got an ERA of 6.08 with a WHIP of 1.61 this year and a career ERA of 5.20 and a career WHIP of 1.40.

    Not exactly what I would call a building block.

    He pitched 30 starts last year to a an ERA of 4.53. He's had games where he's been very good, although not enough. If he pitches to last years level for the next few years, he's a decent 5th starter (depth option). I'm not saying we slot him in as the opening day starter.

  13. #163
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Location
    Ft Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    1,506
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitch View Post
    He pitched 30 starts last year to a an ERA of 4.53. He's had games where he's been very good, although not enough. If he pitches to last years level for the next few years, he's a decent 5th starter (depth option). I'm not saying we slot him in as the opening day starter.
    But by the time the rebuild is complete sale and paxton would be battling for the 5th starter spot.

  14. #164
    All-Star
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,016
    Quote Originally Posted by JDavis76 View Post
    But by the time the rebuild is complete sale and paxton would be battling for the 5th starter spot.
    Yeah, see, you're making the mistake of thinking I'm talking about a rebuild. I'm not.

  15. #165
    Deity moonslav59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Posts
    66,677
    Quote Originally Posted by JDavis76 View Post
    The sox making the playoffs at this point is far from "likely". They are listed as having roughly a 30% chance as it stands right now.
    What percent chance does the current 6th place team have?
    Sox 4 Ever

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •