Register now to remove this ad

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 33

Thread: Cal-kc

  1. #16

    Re: Cal-kc

    No offence, it still doesnt even need cash at all.

  2. #17
    Major Leaguer
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    364

    Re: Cal-kc

    Quote Originally Posted by ang2124
    ok this is how it looks:

    KC Sends:
    Tyler Johnson 5.0 blue
    Matt Cepicky 2.0 gold
    Bob Howry 4.0 gold 300K
    500K

    California Sends:
    Antonio Perez 4.0 Blue 300K
    yup agreed
    QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
    We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
    GM of the California Angels
    2004 91-74. 2005 51-30

  3. #18

    Re: Cal-kc

    ok every1's kool wit it
    Proud KC Royals GM. Aim Name: qback513
    Year 2: 36-19 Best Record in MLB
    Sim #4 Best Hitter: LF Lance Berkman .253 14 HR 44 RBI
    Sim #4 Best Pitcher: SP Brad Penny 6-4 3.10 ERA 67 K's

  4. #19
    Major Leaguer
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    364

    Re: Cal-kc

    http://www.talksox.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2101 first trade to get 2 pages since this one.
    QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
    We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
    GM of the California Angels
    2004 91-74. 2005 51-30

  5. #20

    Re: Cal-kc

    Here's the thing, regardless of your knocks on Johnson, he is still a 5.0 spect and that carries significant weight -- it is something you cannot merely dismiss. If he truly doesn't mean anything to you take him out.

  6. #21

    Re: Cal-kc

    This trade is not vetoable. It's been agreed that it's fine. It may look a little lopsided, but both managers have stated their reasoning. Both have legit reasons. Plus, it's already in anyhow.
    I have no sig. Sue me.

  7. #22
    Major Leaguer
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    364

    Re: Cal-kc

    Quote Originally Posted by youkilis rules
    Here's the thing, regardless of your knocks on Johnson, he is still a 5.0 spect and that carries significant weight -- it is something you cannot merely dismiss. If he truly doesn't mean anything to you take him out.
    A 5.0 reliever spec carries a significant weight. Why?
    QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
    We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
    GM of the California Angels
    2004 91-74. 2005 51-30

  8. #23

    Re: Cal-kc

    my two cents:

    In the beginning, we talked about only voiding trades from NEW GMs and if we thought it would be detrimental to the league. I have to say both KC and ANA are experienced in this league and should be given the benefit of the doubt.
    "You can get a good look at a butcher's ass by sticking your head up there, but wouldn't you rather take his word for it?"
    Chris Farley (Tommy Callahan)

  9. #24

    Re: Cal-kc

    I have to say and excuse my lauguage but ang is getting raped.

  10. #25

    Re: Cal-kc

    well ya know i wasnt gonna use cepicky infact i was demoting him
    i really dont care about 500K i really dont think any1 does
    and tyler johnson ya ok hes 5 stars but not at his potential and might just be a proffesionsal minor leaguer
    Proud KC Royals GM. Aim Name: qback513
    Year 2: 36-19 Best Record in MLB
    Sim #4 Best Hitter: LF Lance Berkman .253 14 HR 44 RBI
    Sim #4 Best Pitcher: SP Brad Penny 6-4 3.10 ERA 67 K's

  11. #26

    Re: Cal-kc

    It's over and done with anyway. The simm should be up soon, according to my sources.
    I have no sig. Sue me.

  12. #27

    Re: Cal-kc

    ya well hes almost done rosters lineups then itll be all simmed
    Proud KC Royals GM. Aim Name: qback513
    Year 2: 36-19 Best Record in MLB
    Sim #4 Best Hitter: LF Lance Berkman .253 14 HR 44 RBI
    Sim #4 Best Pitcher: SP Brad Penny 6-4 3.10 ERA 67 K's

  13. #28
    Major Leaguer
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    364

    Re: Cal-kc

    my sources say hes backing up the file now....
    QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
    We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
    GM of the California Angels
    2004 91-74. 2005 51-30

  14. #29

    Re: Cal-kc

    Funny, my sources agree. WE MUST BE TWINS!!1!11eleventyone
    I have no sig. Sue me.

  15. #30
    Major Leaguer
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    364

    Re: Cal-kc

    Funny my sources are myself
    QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
    We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
    GM of the California Angels
    2004 91-74. 2005 51-30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •