Register now to remove this ad

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 42

Thread: Continuation Tex-Mil

  1. #16

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    We're bumping a 5 minute old conversation? Why?

    And I say again, I dont think Milwaukee needs to argue anything now. As I see it, this is a relatively fair trade. The main issue is, again, whether Soriano is tradeable.

  2. #17
    Major Leaguer
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    364

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    Here I want to organize my thoughts I'll give you my reasons soon....
    QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
    We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
    GM of the California Angels
    2004 91-74. 2005 51-30

  3. #18

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    When i said "BUMP" i meant i wanted to bump your (yeszir) post.

  4. #19
    Major Leaguer
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    364

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    C, Ivan Rodriguez (4.5 gold, $7million)
    DH, Travis Hafner (4.5 gold, $4.2million)

    Texas sends:

    2b, Alfonso Soriano (4.0 gold, $12.5 million)
    SP, Brad Hennessey (4.5 blue, MLC)
    SP, Jerome Gamble (3.5 blue, MLC

    That was the original trade you have added more now. He hasn't confirmed that this trade:
    Milwaukee sends:

    C, Ivan Rodriguez (4.5 gold, $7million)
    DH, Travis Hafner (4.5 gold, $4.2million)

    Texas sends:

    2b, Alfonso Soriano (4.0 gold, $12.5 million)
    C, Mitch Meluskey (2.5 gold, $500K)
    SP, Brad Hennessey (4.0 blue, MLC)
    SP, Jerome Gamble (3.5 blue, MLC)
    RP Gary Majewski (3.5 blue, MLC)
    $2million

    you can't argue for a trade that hasn't happened yet.
    QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
    We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
    GM of the California Angels
    2004 91-74. 2005 51-30

  5. #20

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    Ok heres my opinion on the deal, even if it will go through or not. Soriano may be the most overated player in the league, look at those ratings, 77734, He has absolutely no eye which sorta puts power to waste and strikes out way too much. Milwaukee has a solid infield. Plus Hafner has a 9 GLOVE AT 1B! Dont say hes just a DH! Pudge is the best catcher in the game. HAFNER IS A 91,0,8,7,6. He is better then Soriano and cheaper and a better fielder! Also dont give me hes getting younger, HAFNER IS YOUNGER THEN SORIANO! Yes he loses money but of course you will trading 2 for 1 and he barely loses any. Even if the trade does go through those are just my thoughts on it. Not to add that Soriano is overpaid by 5 mil. Also Huchinson will be the next bedard, a 1.0 , he will be in AAA his whole life.
    WASHINGTON NATIONALS GM/OWNER/COACH/SCOUT

  6. #21

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    QUOTE by Yanks in 05:

    "Also Huchinson will be the next bedard, a 1.0 , he will be in AAA his whole life."

    END QUOTE


    Who?

  7. #22

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    My fault, Henessy
    WASHINGTON NATIONALS GM/OWNER/COACH/SCOUT

  8. #23

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    Once again...as instructed by yeszir: we should only be discussing whether or not Soriano can be traded. If yes, the trade goes through.

  9. #24

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    Well even with the rule stated by ACL, there was a rule set up in the VERY beginning stating that no FAs could be traded til June 1st. So basically you could jsut wait til then to do this trade and everyhting would be ok.
    Former owner of the Talksox Phillies
    Fantasy owner of the Mexico City Mexicans
    Record: 0-0 0 games back
    Next opponent: Redsox05
    AIM: shadoslicer

  10. #25

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    I am under the impression that the rule said after the "beginning of the season" these FAs could be traded.

  11. #26

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    I didnt mean that the fairness of the trade cannot be disputed. If you want to, by all means, dispute the fairness of the trade if you see fit.

    I was just under the impression that the soriano issue was a bigger deal is all.

  12. #27

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    Can we please bring this to a vote between:

    Yagmaster, Radgeta, Sandman, Yeszir, Gertie + CalvnHobs

    ??

  13. #28

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    I don't think I have a vote, because since I'm not on the trade council, apparently my opinion on this doesn't matter. But if I were to have a vote, I would say to let it through. Although Soriano is overpaid, he is performing above his ratings, something that players do all the time. Likewise, players perform well below their ratings as well. Soriano's been good all of last year and through the first month, and has been playing pretty well through the first month. I know some of the trade council guys have some sort of bias against Soriano, but he's a very good player, whether you like it or not. With all the additions Texas is making, I think that balances the trade out, at least to the extent that it's not vetoable.
    I have no sig. Sue me.

  14. #29

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    Thank you Gertie. I was under the impression that with the departure of Noah, you had a TC vote.

  15. #30
    Major Leaguer
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    364

    Re: Continuation Tex-Mil

    with the leaving of noah it leave the council to 5 which could settle the matter.
    QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
    We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
    GM of the California Angels
    2004 91-74. 2005 51-30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •