Originally Posted by Bonds*
Originally Posted by Bonds*
I have a penis.
pwn3d /\
QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
GM of the California Angels
2004 91-74. 2005 51-30
I would like to see the "When Soriano can be traded" vote, sepcifically which of the 5 voted that Soriano CAN be traded and which said he CANT.
Are you going to cry about everything?Originally Posted by youkilis rules
QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
GM of the California Angels
2004 91-74. 2005 51-30
June 15th, 2007.Originally Posted by youkilis rules
I have a penis.
No, im not crying. I would just like to see who voted for which. At least three of the five should feel Soriano cannot be traded until JUNE 1 for this ruling to be valid. I merely want to see who said this.
ALEX GONZALEZ!
I am obligated to remind the group: Alex Gonzalez has been signed as FA this offseason, traded, and it was processed. Nobody raised a stink then. Some of you may not love me, but the point really is infragable. Because he was traded you MUST treat other FAs the same exact way.
Radgeta votes~ Bonds* is doing the sim. He just told you what he was doing about it and if your not crying your pouting.
QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
GM of the California Angels
2004 91-74. 2005 51-30
I vote that Sori can't get traded. There's your three. Me, Bonds, Radgeta. Ok, consider the matter over and done with.
So Radgeta...You voted that Soriano should not be allowed to be traded until June 1 (despite Alex Gonzalez doing so)?
Yes, I believe this should be moved to fights and crap now.Originally Posted by youkilis rules
QUOTE (Noah @ Nov 15 2004, 09:14 PM)
We had another meeting and decided. Rad is too cool to let go of.
GM of the California Angels
2004 91-74. 2005 51-30
Fine. Ding Dong discussion dead. I expect this trade to be processed with the June 1st simm. I can't believe you guys processed Gonzalez and Soriano. Utterly inexplicable.
Sorry guys, but he has a point: you can't just let one trade go through that directly challenges the rule you're enforcing now and not let this one. Either cancel the Gonzalez trade (and any other that might have involved FAs) along with this one, or challenge this based on fairness, not the no-trade rule. I know you guys don't like Texas, but you can't just make one ruling when you've overturned it previously.
I have no sig. Sue me.